Thermodynamics - Work done per unit mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mechanical work per unit mass for a sample of dry air transitioning from an initial pressure of 1000 hPa to a final pressure of 500 hPa at constant temperature. For scenario (a), the work involves isochoric pressure reduction followed by isobaric expansion, requiring the evaluation of specific volumes s1 and s2. In scenario (b), the process starts with isobaric expansion, and the pressure remains at 1000 hPa during the integration, necessitating a PV diagram for clarity. Scenario (c) is characterized as isothermal, requiring a relationship between pressure and specific volume to perform the integral. The importance of incorporating the gas constant in the calculations is emphasized for accurate results.
davcrai
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A sample of dry air has initial pressure p1 = 1000 hPa and temperature T1 = 300k. It undergoes a process that takes it to a new pressure p2 = 500 hPa with unchanged temperature T2 = T1. Compute the mechanical work per unit mass performed by the sample under the following scenarios:
a) Isochoric pressure reduction to p2 followed by isobaric expansion to final state.
b) Isobaric expansion to final specific volume s2 followed by isochoric pressure reduction to final state.
c) Isothermal expansion to final state.

Homework Equations



work = ∫pds
s = Volume/mass

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I think pressure held constant at 500 and the integral preformed between s1 and s2, to get -500*(s2-s1).

b) The integral is ∫p(s)ds with limits s1 to s2 from to give p(s)*(s2-s1), then evaluate at p = 500 for the same result ?

c) The previous two were isothermal?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


davcrai said:

Homework Statement



A sample of dry air has initial pressure p1 = 1000 hPa and temperature T1 = 300k. It undergoes a process that takes it to a new pressure p2 = 500 hPa with unchanged temperature T2 = T1. Compute the mechanical work per unit mass performed by the sample under the following scenarios:
a) Isochoric pressure reduction to p2 followed by isobaric expansion to final state.
b) Isobaric expansion to final specific volume s2 followed by isochoric pressure reduction to final state.
c) Isothermal expansion to final state.

Homework Equations



work = ∫pds
s = Volume/mass

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I think pressure held constant at 500 and the integral preformed between s1 and s2, to get -500*(s2-s1).
Looks reasonable so far, but you need to figure out values for s1 and s2. Also, watch the units.

b) The integral is ∫p(s)ds with limits s1 to s2 from to give p(s)*(s2-s1), then evaluate at p = 500 for the same result ?
The pressure is not 500 hPa for this one; the first step is isobaric in this case. Try drawing yourself a PV diagram, to help figure out what is going on.

c) The previous two were isothermal?
Um, no, they were not. There were two steps, one isochoric and one isobaric. So the temperature changed during processes (a) and (b), even though it ended up at the initial temperature.

This time, it is isothermal during the entire process.
 


ok, so I think for the second one you hold p constant at 1000hPa for the integration then evaluate between s1 and s2?
Still unsure about the third one?
 


davcrai said:
ok, so I think for the second one you hold p constant at 1000hPa for the integration then evaluate between s1 and s2?
Yes. You'll also need to figure out what s1 and s2 are.
Still unsure about the third one?
You need to find an equation that relates P and s, using the fact that T=constant. (Hint: the substance is air, and air is a gas.)

Once you have the relation between P and s, do the integral ∫p·ds.
 


Hmmm, might it include density and a gas constant by any chance...
Thanks
 


It would definitely include the gas constant.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top