Time period of oscillation and displacement from O

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why the period of oscillation (T) remains constant despite changes in displacement (A) in simple harmonic motion, specifically for springs. It is explained that, according to Hooke's Law, while the restoring force increases with displacement, the period is independent of amplitude, leading to a consistent frequency. The mechanics of simple harmonic oscillators show that greater displacement results in a proportionally greater restoring force, allowing for a faster cycle without altering the period. The conversation also touches on pendulum behavior, noting that the period can change at larger angles, but for small oscillations, it remains constant. Overall, the key takeaway is that in ideal simple harmonic systems, the period does not depend on amplitude.
magiclink
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the attachment!

The Attempt at a Solution


My big hangup in this situation is why T, the period, of the oscillation doesn't change?
If you increase the displacement by 2A does this mean that since the force acting on the spring also increases proportionally there's just no change in frequency and the time period of oscillation? I understand however that the energy in the system increases is quadrupled. graphing Force with respect to distance, it's 4 times the area underneath the graph if you double A, the displacement, according to hooke's law.

So! Why does the Time period of oscillation not change at all? This is what confuses me! Thankyou for any response :)
 

Attachments

  • Hooke's law and Time periods.jpg
    Hooke's law and Time periods.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 508
Physics news on Phys.org
hi magiclink! :smile:
magiclink said:
… why T, the period, of the oscillation doesn't change?

same as the reason why the period of a pendulum doesn't change (that's why a pendulum clock works steadily even though it's running down) …

it's a simple harmonic oscillator: the equation is x'' = -kx, and the solutions are harmonic functions with frequency √k, times constants :wink:
 
This is a feature of the simple harmonic oscillator, the period is independent of the amplitude. In terms of the mechanics, the greater maximum displacement means a greater restoring force so a faster trip through the cycle.

Imagine different spring force relationships, F = f(x). If the restoring force gets larger much faster as x increases then for larger displacements you get a faster cycle. (Imagine a rubber ball swinging on a pendulum and bouncing between two walls until it losses enough energy and simply swings at a slower rate.

Likewise if the restoring force grows more slowly with x you'll have what you intuition might imagine, larger amplitudes have longer periods. Example there, orbiting planets.

Somewhere in between there should be a spring force relationship where the period for all amplitudes match. That turns out to be the Hook's law case.
 
tiny-tim said:
hi magiclink! :smile:


same as the reason why the period of a pendulum doesn't change (that's why a pendulum clock works steadily even though it's running down) …

it's a simple harmonic oscillator: the equation is x'' = -kx, and the solutions are harmonic functions with frequency √k, times constants :wink:

Actually a true pendulum does change. We take the SHO approximation for small oscillations sin(\theta) \approx \theta. :wink: :wink:

The "rule of thumb" is when the pendulum swings more than 10° the SHO approximation breaks down and you shouldn't assume it has constant period. In the extreme case, if you start the pendulum all the way at the top it has infinite period. If it's not quite all the way up, you get a long wait while it slowly moves further off center and then the big swing.
 
Thankyou so much for your replies! It's helped me tremendously! :) I've wrapped my head around it now.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top