Torque required to rotate something

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ask1122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotate Torque
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the torque required to start rotating a vertical cylinder resting on a flat surface. Participants explore the relationship between torque, static friction, and the physical properties of the cylinder, including its mass and radius. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and mathematical approaches to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the torque required to rotate the cylinder is analogous to overcoming static friction, suggesting a formula involving the coefficient of static friction and normal force.
  • Others introduce the concept of rolling resistance and its impact on the torque needed to initiate rotation, noting that deformation at the contact point plays a role.
  • A participant questions the axis about which the cylinder will rotate and the application point of the force, emphasizing the importance of these factors in calculating torque.
  • Several participants suggest integrating the contributions of cylindrical shells to determine the total torque, with varying approaches to defining the mass and area of these shells.
  • There are discussions about whether to include density in the calculations and how to properly set up the integral for torque based on static friction for each element of the cylinder.
  • Some participants express confusion over the correct formulation of the volume and mass elements involved in the integration process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact formulation for calculating the torque required to rotate the cylinder. Multiple competing views and methods for approaching the problem are presented, with ongoing clarification and refinement of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the assumptions needed for the calculations, such as the distribution of mass and the definition of the elements used in integration. There are also unresolved questions about the relationship between the static friction force and the torque calculation.

Ask1122
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, was doing some thinking on torque, we all know that we can calculate torque by using T= Force x radius. But let's say if i have a cylinder of mass x kg which has a radius of r, sitting vertically on the floor (flat surface on the floor). How do i determine how much torque is required to start rotating this cylinder?
I am thinking that it will probably be similar to pushing / pulling a box on a surface, the box will only start moving once the static friction is exceeded, it is similar in this case that cylinder only rotates once static friction is exceeded, which means F=mu x N should come into this, i am thinking maybe Torque required to turn = mu x N x radius??

Thanks all~
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The required torque is related to the rolling resistance. When at rest, there's a tiny flattened spot on the bottom of the cylinder, and a tiny curved derformation in the surfrace the cylinder rests on. This results in in both a (linear) force and torque a that oppose movment. The smaller the deformation and the more elastic the surfaces, the lower the rolling resistance. If the rolling resistance is very small then almost all of the applied torque is being used to increase linear and angular kinetic energy.
 


Jeff, the OP is talking about a cylinder with a flat face resting on the floor.
 


russ_watters said:
So then static friction...

If i am trying to slide the whole cylinder, then i understand it will start sliding when the force exerted exceed the static friction.

But i wanted to know the torque that will start rotating the cylinder and not sliding it, any idea how i can calculate that?

Thanks!
 
About what axis will the cylinder start to rotate initially? Where are you applying the force?
 


Ask1122 said:
But i wanted to know the torque that will start rotating the cylinder and not sliding it, any idea how i can calculate that?
Try this: Assume that the cylinder's weight is uniformly distributed over its area. Set up an expression for the torque required to overcome static friction for an element of that area and integrate to find the total torque required.
 
Well, it would be an easy calculation for a hollow cylinder. Since all the mass is concentrated at the radius, torque would simply be μmgr.

You can think of a solid cylinder as being made up of many hollow cylinders, all nested together. Then add up the contributions of all the cylinders, which should mean doing an integral to get the total torque.
 
Merry Christmas!

Hi Ask1122! :smile:

(have a mu: µ :wink:)
Ask1122 said:
Hi guys, was doing some thinking on torque, we all know that we can calculate torque by using T= Force x radius. But let's say if i have a cylinder of mass x kg which has a radius of r, sitting vertically on the floor (flat surface on the floor). How do i determine how much torque is required to start rotating this cylinder?

If it was a cylindrical shell, then the friction torque would be µsmgR.

So divide the cylinder into shells of radius r and width dr, find the mass of each shell, and then integrate the friction torque for each shell, from r = 0 to R. :wink:
 
  • #10
Ask1122 said:
... i wanted to know the torque that will start rotating the cylinder and not sliding it, any idea how i can calculate that?

Thanks!

Stonebridge said:
About what axis will the cylinder start to rotate initially? Where are you applying the force?
Since the CM is not sliding, the rotation axis would be the central axis of the cylinder. Also, the question is about torque, not force, to start the rotation.
 
  • #11
Thx for the answers all! Please see if i got the idea correctly:
Assuming if it is a solid cylinder, then i will integrate the following function (mu*m*g)
mu * pi * r^2 * height of cylinder * rho (density of cylinder) * gravity
= mu * pi * h * rho * g * r^2
after integration (from 0 to r)= mu * pi * h * rho * g * r^3 * 1/3 = Torque required to rotate the cyclinder

Is it right?

Thanks all!
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Ask1122 said:
Thx for the answers all! Please see if i got the idea correctly:
Assuming if it is a solid cylinder, then i will integrate the following function (mu*m*g*r)
mu * pi * r^2 * height of cylinder * rho (density of cylinder) * gravity * r
= mu * pi * h * rho * g * r^3
Again, write an expression for the torque for an element of area. (Circular rings are fine.) Once you get that expression, then you can integrate.

You don't need the density of the cylinder (just assume its mass is M), but you do need its weight per unit area.
 
  • #13
Hi Ask1122! :smile:

(what happened to that µ i gave you? :confused:)
Ask1122 said:
Assuming if it is a solid cylinder, then i will integrate the following function (mu*m*g)
mu * pi * r^2 * height of cylinder * rho (density of cylinder) * gravity …

No, your volume is wrong, you need the volume of a cylindrical shell.

Hint: if you're going to integrate, then the volume will have to have a dr in it, won't it? :wink:
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
Again, write an expression for the torque for an element of area. (Circular rings are fine.) Once you get that expression, then you can integrate.

You don't need the density of the cylinder (just assume its mass is M), but you do need its weight per unit area.

hmm i don't understand, if i assume mass is M, then wouldn't i take away the r in the equation, but i need the r term because i am integrating using the area of the ring?

Let me write the equation out in full this time:
F (static friction) = µmg (thx for the µ tiny ;) )
F dr = µmg dr
therefore, F dr = T = integral sign µ*pi*r^2*h*rho*g dr
T = µ*pi*h*rho*g*r^3*1/3 | 0 to r
T = µ*pi*h*rho*g*r^3*1/3 - 0
therefore, T = µ*pi*h*rho*g*r^3*1/3

I am not sure where did the volume go wrong??

Thanks!
 
  • #15
Ask1122 said:
hmm i don't understand, if i assume mass is M, then wouldn't i take away the r in the equation, but i need the r term because i am integrating using the area of the ring?
:confused: Calling the mass of the cylinder M has nothing to do with the r term in the expression for torque.

Let me write the equation out in full this time:
F (static friction) = µmg (thx for the µ tiny ;) )
What's 'm' the mass of? Hint: 'mg' has to be the weight allocated to the element of area. That must have an area term and thus a 'dr'.
F dr = µmg dr
Not sure what you are doing here.

Do this, step by step:

Define the element of area.
Define the amount of the cylinder's weight allocated to that element of area.
Define the static friction allocated to that element of area.
Write an expression for the torque required to overcome the static friction for that element of area.

Then you'll have a correct expression for the torque that you can then integrate.
 
  • #16
Hi Ask1122! :smile:

(have an integral: ∫ and a pi: π and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
Ask1122 said:
… therefore, F dr = T = integral sign µ*pi*r^2*h*rho*g dr

I am not sure where did the volume go wrong??

πr2hdr isn't the volume, is it? :wink:

(and you can write density = M/πR2h)
 
  • #17
Thx for the advices, but i am having some difficulties in finding the right expression for the element. Please see if what i am doing makes sense.
I will use the circumference as my elements which will be 2πr, there will be infinite amount of circules from the centre point to the outer diameter and summing them up will give me area of the cyclinder base, therefore area = 2πr dr.
All circles will have the same height h, thus, area * h * ρ will give me my mass.
And m*g*µ will give the static friction force for that particular element, times that by r will give the torque required.

So my integration formula will be as follow:
T = ∫ µ*r*g*ρ*h*2πr dr (limits are from centre to radius r = 0 to r)
therefore: T = µ*g*ρ*h*πr³*2/3 - 0

is this correct?

Thanks!
 
  • #18
Hi Ask1122! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
Ask1122 said:
T = ∫ µ*r*g*ρ*h*2πr dr (limits are from centre to radius r = 0 to r)
therefore: T = µ*g*ρ*h*πr³*2/3 - 0

is this correct?

Thanks!

ah, now I see it all written out, yes that's fine (with R instead of r, of course). :smile:

(I was confused when you left out the dr, and I thought you'd got an r2 into the area :confused:)

ok, now rewrite ρ in terms of M and R. :wink:
 
  • #19
Cool! so it will become T = 2/3 *µ*N*R for a solid cylinder :D
Ok, so one down and a million other questions to go!
Thx for the help all! :D
 
  • #20
That's a correct answer, though it seems the answer should be in terms of mass M rather than the normal force N.

I.e., substitute N = ___?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K