Tough exponential integral (QM, Variational Principle)

xago
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/224/32665300.png

The Attempt at a Solution


http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/2920/scan0003xo.jpg

I've uploaded my work so far since its much faster than typing and I'm stuck on the last line trying to solve the integral.
The first part of the integral is calculable but the second term(containing V_{0}) doesn't evaluate with Maple or Wolfram.
On the question sheet it gives the hint that \int dx x^{n} e^{-\alpha x} = \frac{n!}{\alpha^{n+1}} which leads me to rearrange the 2nd term to -2V_{0}\alphaa*e^{r\frac{(-1-2\alpha a)}{a}}*r^{-1}
According to the tip, \int e^{r\frac{(-1-2\alpha a)}{a}}*r^{-1} is equal to \frac{(-1)!}{\frac{(-1-2\alpha a)}{a}^{-1+1}} which is just -1.
This doesn't seem to match up with the given Hamiltonian on the problem set so I'm asking for some extra help on this,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to start over from the beginning. You need to integrate over all three dimensions, not just over r. Also, don't forget to use the correct volume element for spherical coordinates.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top