Two Rolling Objects Racing Down a Hill?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about two rolling objects, a sphere and a disk, racing down an incline, it is established that the sphere will reach the bottom first due to its lower moment of inertia. The participants explore the relationship between angular acceleration and linear acceleration, noting that the gravitational force acts through the center of mass while friction acts at the edge. There is confusion regarding how to combine the effects of gravitational and frictional forces to determine static friction and acceleration. The solution suggests analyzing moments about the contact point to simplify the calculations. Overall, the focus is on understanding the dynamics of rolling motion and the role of friction in this context.
dwangus
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are two objects rolling down a hill of incline theta, one is a sphere and one is a disk, each of equal radius and mass.
Which one gets down first and how much faster than the other?
What's the coefficient of static friction of the hill?

Homework Equations


Moment of inertia equations for disk and sphere.
Net Torque = Iα
α = a/r
Mgsinθ
Frictional Force
Net Force = ma

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, so I left out information on purpose, because I just need the general solutions to work these things out.
I know that the sphere will obviously win because it has a lower coefficient of moment of inertia. And I know that for each object's moment of inertia will lead to different angular accelerations, which can lead you to understanding how fast each is individually going (alpha = a/r). And I also know that the net torque force is equal to I x alpha, and that the torques needed are mgsinθ and the force of friction... but in the end, I'm not quite sure how to put the frictional force and the gravitational force together to produce angular or linear acceleration, because the gravitational force acts through each object's center of mass, and the frictional force acts on the edge? I don't know how to reconcile the different axes...

And because of that, I absolutely do not know how to find the static friction of the cliff.
Please help? You can make up your own radii and masses and angles if you want, this is all purely theoretical anyways.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since it is a question about rolling, you don't really care about the frictional force beyond that it is enough to prevent sliding. So the easiest way is to take moments about a point for which the frictional force has no moment. Where would that be?
 
The contact point of the object and the cliff?
 
dwangus said:
The contact point of the object and the cliff?
Yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top