Under what conditions is a pendulum a Simple Harmonic Oscillator, why?

AI Thread Summary
A pendulum behaves as a simple harmonic oscillator under specific conditions, primarily when there is no damping and the displacement is small. "Small" refers to a quantity that is negligible compared to another relevant quantity, often expressed as a dimensionless ratio much less than one. The approximation that allows a pendulum's motion to be described as simple harmonic occurs when the angle is small enough for sin θ to be approximated as θ. This leads to a differential equation similar to that of simple harmonic motion. Understanding these conditions is crucial for accurately modeling pendulum behavior in physics.
MetalManuel
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
For part of my lab write up on pendulum motion, my professor wanted us to find out why a pendulum was not a simple harmonic oscillator, and under what conditions it was. He also wanted to show this mathematically.

So far what I have is that if there is no damping(friction?) and if the the displacement is "small." I have no idea what "small" means. Can someone elaborate on this?

Keep in mind that this is my first semester in college and that this is my first calculus based physics class, so I don't know too much.

Right now we're on impulse and momentum. So anything beyond that I really don't know the math behind it, but maybe the idea yes. So if you do provide variables that are beyond that, please elaborate.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A simple harmonic oscillator is made by a ...(1) and a ...(2)
Write the force formula for these objects.

The pendulum is made by a ... (1) and ...(3), something different from (2).
Write the force equation for 3.

Under which condition Force(2) ~= costant * Force(3) ?
 
Last edited:
When you say some quantity is small, it's in comparison to some quantity which sets the scale of the problem. For instance, if you were talking about the collision between you and a flea, you could reasonably say the mass of the flea is negligible because it's small compared to your mass. Mathematically, you'd say mflea/myou<<1. On the other hand, if a problem involved you and the mass of the Earth, this time your mass would be negligible because myou/mEarth<<1. You should always be able to express smallness in terms of a dimensionless quantity being much less than 1.

Note the measure of an angle (in radians) is already dimensionless. It sounds kind of weird, but we really only write "radians" to keep track of the fact that some unitless number represents the measure of an angle.

The differential equation that governs a simple pendulum's motion isn't exactly the same as the one describing simple harmonic motion; however, with the right approximation, namely when sin θ≈θ, it reduces to the case of simple harmonic motion. So what you want to do is come up with a criterion for when sin θ≈θ is a good approximation.
 
Quinzio said:
A simple harmonic oscillator is made by a ...(1) and a ...(2)
Write the force formula for these objects.

The pendulum is made by a ... (1) and ...(3), something different from (2).
Write the force equation for 3.

Under which condition Force(2) ~= costant * Force(3) ?

haha thanks. I did not think about it like that.

vela said:
When you say some quantity is small, it's in comparison to some quantity which sets the scale of the problem. For instance, if you were talking about the collision between you and a flea, you could reasonably say the mass of the flea is negligible because it's small compared to your mass. Mathematically, you'd say mflea/myou<<1. On the other hand, if a problem involved you and the mass of the Earth, this time your mass would be negligible because myou/mEarth<<1. You should always be able to express smallness in terms of a dimensionless quantity being much less than 1.

Note the measure of an angle (in radians) is already dimensionless. It sounds kind of weird, but we really only write "radians" to keep track of the fact that some unitless number represents the measure of an angle.

The differential equation that governs a simple pendulum's motion isn't exactly the same as the one describing simple harmonic motion; however, with the right approximation, namely when sin θ≈θ, it reduces to the case of simple harmonic motion. So what you want to do is come up with a criterion for when sin θ≈θ is a good approximation.

Thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top