Underdamped harmonic oscillator with a sinusoidal driving force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the driving frequency ωd that maximizes both displacement and velocity amplitudes in an underdamped harmonic oscillator subjected to a sinusoidal driving force. Participants emphasize the importance of using differential calculus to determine these maxima, with hints provided on relevant equations and concepts. There is confusion regarding the provided equation for displacement, particularly the absence of time and the meaning of the variable gamma. Suggestions include using the relationship between force, potential energy, and acceleration to derive the necessary equations. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in the mathematical formulation to effectively solve the problem.
captainemeric
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider an underdamped harmonic oscillator (Q > 1/2) with a sinusoidal driving
force Focos(ωdt).
(a) (5 pts) By using differential calculus find ωd that maximizes the displacement amplitude.
(b) (7 pts) By using differential calculus find ωd that maximizes the velocity amplitude.


Homework Equations


x(t)= (fo/m)/sqrt([wo^2-wd^2]^2+(gama(wd)^2)



The Attempt at a Solution


I know what the end solution will be and the general theory behind this but I am unsure how to proceed. I am unsure how to prove the point at which it is the maximum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The clue is pretty much in "differential calculus". What tool have you learned in calculus for finding the maximum of a function?
 
captainemeric said:

Homework Statement


Consider an underdamped harmonic oscillator (Q > 1/2) with a sinusoidal driving
force Focos(ωdt).
(a) (5 pts) By using differential calculus find ωd that maximizes the displacement amplitude.
(b) (7 pts) By using differential calculus find ωd that maximizes the velocity amplitude.


Homework Equations


x(t)= (fo/m)/sqrt([wo^2-wd^2]^2+(gama(wd)^2)



The Attempt at a Solution


I know what the end solution will be and the general theory behind this but I am unsure how to proceed. I am unsure how to prove the point at which it is the maximum.

Let me give you a hint on the general theory behind this:

your relevant equation seems flat bizarre

first of all, why is there no 't' in x(t)

and what is gama?
---------

to set you in the direction i would go:

you have your driving force F

F=-d/dx(V(x)

then V(x) = potential energy

maximum value of V(x)= total energy = 1/2*mass*velocity^2+V(x)

then solve for velocity, and integrate with respect to time to get x(t).
---------
or just say (1/m)*F= acceleration and integrate twice with respect to time to get x(t)

-----
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top