Underdamped harmonic oscillator with a sinusoidal driving force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the driving frequency ωd that maximizes both displacement and velocity amplitudes in an underdamped harmonic oscillator subjected to a sinusoidal driving force. Participants emphasize the importance of using differential calculus to determine these maxima, with hints provided on relevant equations and concepts. There is confusion regarding the provided equation for displacement, particularly the absence of time and the meaning of the variable gamma. Suggestions include using the relationship between force, potential energy, and acceleration to derive the necessary equations. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in the mathematical formulation to effectively solve the problem.
captainemeric
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider an underdamped harmonic oscillator (Q > 1/2) with a sinusoidal driving
force Focos(ωdt).
(a) (5 pts) By using differential calculus find ωd that maximizes the displacement amplitude.
(b) (7 pts) By using differential calculus find ωd that maximizes the velocity amplitude.


Homework Equations


x(t)= (fo/m)/sqrt([wo^2-wd^2]^2+(gama(wd)^2)



The Attempt at a Solution


I know what the end solution will be and the general theory behind this but I am unsure how to proceed. I am unsure how to prove the point at which it is the maximum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The clue is pretty much in "differential calculus". What tool have you learned in calculus for finding the maximum of a function?
 
captainemeric said:

Homework Statement


Consider an underdamped harmonic oscillator (Q > 1/2) with a sinusoidal driving
force Focos(ωdt).
(a) (5 pts) By using differential calculus find ωd that maximizes the displacement amplitude.
(b) (7 pts) By using differential calculus find ωd that maximizes the velocity amplitude.


Homework Equations


x(t)= (fo/m)/sqrt([wo^2-wd^2]^2+(gama(wd)^2)



The Attempt at a Solution


I know what the end solution will be and the general theory behind this but I am unsure how to proceed. I am unsure how to prove the point at which it is the maximum.

Let me give you a hint on the general theory behind this:

your relevant equation seems flat bizarre

first of all, why is there no 't' in x(t)

and what is gama?
---------

to set you in the direction i would go:

you have your driving force F

F=-d/dx(V(x)

then V(x) = potential energy

maximum value of V(x)= total energy = 1/2*mass*velocity^2+V(x)

then solve for velocity, and integrate with respect to time to get x(t).
---------
or just say (1/m)*F= acceleration and integrate twice with respect to time to get x(t)

-----
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top