Understanding Spherical Symmetry of Electron Clouds in External Fields

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the balance of forces acting on a nucleus in an external electric field, highlighting the equation that relates electric force and charge distribution. It addresses the assumption that the electron cloud can be treated as a spherically symmetric charge distribution despite the influence of the external field, which would intuitively distort it. The approximation of uniform and symmetric charge distribution is deemed valid for small external fields, although it acknowledges that real distributions are not perfectly symmetric. This simplification is essential for developing more accurate solutions through methods like perturbation theory and quantum mechanics. Ultimately, while the problem is complex, these approximations are often effective in practice.
versine
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
A hydrogen atom consists of a proton nucleus of charge +e and an electron of charge -e. The charge distribution of the atom is spherically symmetric, so the atom is nonpolar. Consider a model in which the hydrogen atom consists of a positive point charge +e at the center of a uniformly charged spherical cloud of radius R and total charge -e. Show when an atom is placed in a uniform external electric field vector E, the induced dipole moment is proportional to vector E; that is vector p = alpha * vector E, where alpha is called the polarizability.
Relevant Equations
Electric Dipole
Coulomb law
Shell Theorem
The given diagram looks something like this:
1627426211081.png


Electric force on nucleus from external field must balance attraction force from electron cloud and electric force from external field.

$$e\vec{E}=\frac{k(\frac{L^3}{R^3}e)}{L^2}\hat{L}$$ where ##\vec{L}## is from center of electron cloud to nucleus.

$$\vec{E}=\frac{keL\hat{L}}{R^3}=\frac{k\vec{p}}{R^3}\implies\vec{p}=4\pi\epsilon_0R^3\vec{E}$$

But why can you treat the electron cloud as a spherically symmetric charge distribution even after the external electric field is applied? The external electric field will repel it. Shouldn't it be more of an oval shape, with the charge distribution more concentrated near the new location of the nucleus?
 

Attachments

  • 1627426089759.png
    1627426089759.png
    9.8 KB · Views: 149
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem simply asks you to assume that the distribution of charge of the electron remains uniform and symmetric. Of course it really isn't uniform and it doesn't remain exactly symmetric so there are two issues. For small external fields (what does small mean?) this is not a bad assumption and provides the method by which we build a better solution (using perturbation theory and quantum mechanics). But its a good question and the answer is that the real problem is difficult but these approximations work well enough often.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top