Understanding Spherical Symmetry of Electron Clouds in External Fields

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the balance of forces acting on a nucleus in an external electric field, highlighting the equation that relates electric force and charge distribution. It addresses the assumption that the electron cloud can be treated as a spherically symmetric charge distribution despite the influence of the external field, which would intuitively distort it. The approximation of uniform and symmetric charge distribution is deemed valid for small external fields, although it acknowledges that real distributions are not perfectly symmetric. This simplification is essential for developing more accurate solutions through methods like perturbation theory and quantum mechanics. Ultimately, while the problem is complex, these approximations are often effective in practice.
versine
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
A hydrogen atom consists of a proton nucleus of charge +e and an electron of charge -e. The charge distribution of the atom is spherically symmetric, so the atom is nonpolar. Consider a model in which the hydrogen atom consists of a positive point charge +e at the center of a uniformly charged spherical cloud of radius R and total charge -e. Show when an atom is placed in a uniform external electric field vector E, the induced dipole moment is proportional to vector E; that is vector p = alpha * vector E, where alpha is called the polarizability.
Relevant Equations
Electric Dipole
Coulomb law
Shell Theorem
The given diagram looks something like this:
1627426211081.png


Electric force on nucleus from external field must balance attraction force from electron cloud and electric force from external field.

$$e\vec{E}=\frac{k(\frac{L^3}{R^3}e)}{L^2}\hat{L}$$ where ##\vec{L}## is from center of electron cloud to nucleus.

$$\vec{E}=\frac{keL\hat{L}}{R^3}=\frac{k\vec{p}}{R^3}\implies\vec{p}=4\pi\epsilon_0R^3\vec{E}$$

But why can you treat the electron cloud as a spherically symmetric charge distribution even after the external electric field is applied? The external electric field will repel it. Shouldn't it be more of an oval shape, with the charge distribution more concentrated near the new location of the nucleus?
 

Attachments

  • 1627426089759.png
    1627426089759.png
    9.8 KB · Views: 161
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem simply asks you to assume that the distribution of charge of the electron remains uniform and symmetric. Of course it really isn't uniform and it doesn't remain exactly symmetric so there are two issues. For small external fields (what does small mean?) this is not a bad assumption and provides the method by which we build a better solution (using perturbation theory and quantum mechanics). But its a good question and the answer is that the real problem is difficult but these approximations work well enough often.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
923
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
961
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
4K