Uniform electric field moving a proton and electron

AI Thread Summary
A uniform electric field of 640 N/C exists between two parallel plates, with a proton released from the positive plate and an electron from the negative plate. The equations of motion for both particles were set up to find the point where they would meet, but the calculations revealed discrepancies in their positions. The key confusion arose from the fact that while both particles experience the same electric field, their differing masses lead to unequal accelerations. The correct approach is to consider that the sum of the distances they travel must equal the distance between the plates, rather than assuming they meet at the same point. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in electric fields.
gsquare567
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform electric field of magnitude 640 N/C exists between two parallel plates that are 4.00 cm apart. A proton is released from the positive plate at the same instand that an electron is released from the negative plate. Determine the distance from the positive plate that the two pass each other. (Ignore the electrostatic attraction between the proton and electron.)

r = 0.04 m
E = 640 N/C
qp = 1.6 * 10-19 C
qe = -1.6 * 10-19 C
mp = 1.67 * 10-27 kg
me = 1/1830 * mp

Homework Equations


[1] x = x0 + v0 + 1/2*a*t2
[2] F = ma = qE

The Attempt at a Solution



PROTON:
using [2], a = qp*E/mp
subbing into [1], xp = 1/2(qp*E/mp)t2

ELECTRON:
xe = r + 1/2(qe*E/me)t2

see when xp = xe
t = \sqrt{2*r/(E(q<sub>p</sub>/m<sub>p</sub> - q<sub>e</sub>/m<sub>e</sub>}
i get t = 2.67 * 10-8 seconds

but when i plug it in for xp i get 2.18*10-5 m, whereas xe is 4.00 * 10-2 m

they should be equal =S

where did i go wrong? thanks! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Should they be equal? Does equal force imply equal acceleration in this case?
 
I thought they would be different because a proton has 1830 times the mass of an electron, and as F = m * a... Am I wrong?
 
No, no, you're right in that. They won't meet in the middle, though, because they've been accelerated unequally. You want not xp = xe, but xp + xe = 4.
 
Oh, I understand what you mean now. However, they are released from opposite ends, so I think when they cross, their x values should be equal. That is why my x equation for the electron starts at r = 4.
 
If one particle starts at 0, and the other at r = 4, then one will accelerate in the positive r direction, and the other will accelerate in the negative x direction.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top