Using Gauss's Law to determine an electric field

AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law is discussed as a method to determine electric fields, with the equation φ = ∫E dA = Q/ε₀ being central to the conversation. The user has simplified the equation to E = Q/(2πrε₀) but is uncertain about its correctness and application. Assistance is offered to study the basics of Gauss's Law and its derivation. The importance of understanding the applications of Gauss's Law is emphasized for solving the homework problem. Further guidance is promised once the user gains a clearer understanding of the concepts.
loba333
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Gauss.jpg



Homework Equations



{\phi} = \int E dA = \frac{QL}{\epsilon_0}

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm aware of the definition of Gauss's law of electrostatics (however evidently I'm not very good at applying it), but I can't seem to fully answer the rest of the question.

An example in my book states the equation above and I've managed to simplify it to this state:

E = \frac{Q}{2\pi r \epsilon_0}

But I was wondering if this is the right route to go down, and if this is a correct equation, how I could use it to solve this problem.

Thanks in advance for any help, will be checking back sporadically.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good. You found the answer to (ii) in part (b). Do you know what the answer to (i) is?
 
answer to (i) (a) was given in your book or you know how to derive it?
 
Not quite sure how to derive it and I didn't even know I'd done the answer to part (ii) :X
 
Ok .. so you need to study applications of guass law

go here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/gaulaw.html"

just study basics of usage of guass law ... and yes also please your questions's derivation too.
and come back on this forum when you have understood it ...
we'll help you find answer to rest of questions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top