Using Lagrangian to derive the equation of motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation of motion for a mass-spring-pulley system using Lagrangian mechanics. The kinetic energy is expressed as T = 1/2 (m)(x_dot) + 1/2 (I)(theta_dot), while the potential energy is V = 1/2 k(R)(x). Participants emphasize the importance of correctly formulating the Lagrangian as L = T - V and highlight the need for a constraint relating the generalized coordinates x and θ, specifically x = Rθ. To derive the equations of motion, it is crucial to apply this constraint and derive a single equation that incorporates both coordinates. The conversation underscores the necessity of accurately defining the Lagrangian to proceed with the solution.
mmalon15
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


derive the equation of motion of a mass-spring-pulley system using lagrange's equations. A mass m is connected to a spring of stiffness k, through a string wrapped around a rigid pulley of radius R and mass moment of inertia, I.

Homework Equations


kinetic energey
T = 1/2 (m)(x_dot) + 1/2 (I)(theta_dot)
potential energy
V = 1/2 k(R)(x)

The Attempt at a Solution


20170212_201908.jpg

sorry for the sideways picture... don't know why its doing that. but please help homework is due tomorrow morning! thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your Lagrangian? Without writing it down, you will not be able to derive the equations of motion.
It seems your generalized coordinates are x and θ. Is there a constraint relating the two?
 
ts the second to last equation on the picture, with the partial derivatives to the respect of x. so ∂T/∂x⋅ - ∂T/∂x + ∂V/∂x = Q

and i believe there's a onstraint of x = rθ
 
That's not the Lagrangian. The Lagrangian is L = T - V. What you have is the equation for generalized coordinate x. You need to write another such equation involving θ and apply the constraint relating x and θ to get a single equation of motion.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top