Validity of Tensor Expressions in (a)-(d)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ibix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
13,309
Reaction score
15,747
Another trivial question from me.

Homework Statement



Which (if any) of the following are valid tensor expressions:
(a)A^\alpha+B_\alpha
(b)R^\alpha{}_\beta A^\beta+B^\alpha=0
(c)R_{\alpha\beta}=T_\gamma
(d)A_{\alpha\beta}=B_{\beta\alpha}

Homework Equations



Nothing relevant - these are generic tensors.

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) and (c) are not valid because the indices don't match up. (d) is valid - in matrix notation, A=BT.

I'm not sure about (b), though. The left hand side is valid; summing over the dummy index makes it a sum of two vectors. I'm not quite sure how to interpret the equality, though. I can see it as a vector equaling a scalar - which is not valid. Alternatively, I can read an implicit \forall \alpha - in other words, that each element of the vector on the left hand side is identically zero.

I lean towards the first interpretation - but I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For an equation like (b), the zero on the right would normally be interpreted as the zero vector (rather than the zero scalar); or more precisely, it would be the ##\alpha## component of the zero vector (which would of course have a value of 0 in any coordinate system and any reference frame). So, I think your second interpretation is better.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you very much.

This is self-study. When I downloaded the problem sheet the answers were available - now term has started and they've gone... Shouldn't have been conscientious.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top