Verifying Electrostatic Charges: Q and q

AI Thread Summary
Two identical conducting spheres initially attract each other with a force of 0.136 N at a distance of 65.0 cm. After connecting them with a wire, they repel each other with a force of 0.0477 N once the wire is removed. The problem involves determining the initial negative and positive charges on the spheres using Coulomb's law. The discussion emphasizes using the total charge after connection and substituting values to solve for the individual charges. The correct approach involves setting up a quadratic equation based on the conservation of charge and the forces involved.
czaitz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have attempted this problem twice and have one more chance before I get the "red ex" so I thought I'd check my thinking.

Two identical conducting spheres, fixed in place, attract each other with an electrostatic force of 0.136 N when their center-to-center separation is 65.0 cm. The spheres are then connected by a thin conducting wire. When the wire is removed, the spheres repel each other with an electrostatic force of 0.0477 N. Of the initial charges on the spheres, with a positive net charge, what was (a) the negative charge in coulombs on one of them and (b) the positive charge in coulombs on the other?

To find q I used Coulomb's equation, solving for q, which is the charge on the spheres after they touch. That was q= 1.497E-6 C.
Then I thought that F=k Q(Q+2q)/r^2 but that made for some hairy quadratic action trying to get Q and Q+2.
Plus they said my answers were wrong twice.

For this one I got Q = 1.05E-6 C and then the other (+) ball would be 6.11E-6 C.

Is my thinking anywhere in the ballpark? I'm not so sure on the second part.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're on the right track, you use the second situation to find the total charge, then substitute into the first situation to get a quadratic for the two initial charges. The substitution should be q2=2q-q1. Then q1(2q-q1)=F*r^2/k, which should give you the two answers you need.
 
Thanks, but can you clarify the substitution? I callled the unknown charges Q and Q + 2q because 2q is what one sphere had extra before it discharged to the other sphere.
I'm not sure what the qs are in your substitution...q2 is 2q minus q1? The new charges are q2 and q1?
 
The two initial charges are q1 and q2, which you want to find. q is the charge on each sphere after they have been connected, they are both q as they have the same radius. This you found, 1.497E-6 C. The total charge is 2q, which is equal to q1+q2, as charge is conserved. So you substitute q2=2q-q1 into Coulomb's law for the first situation, and find q1, then put that back into 2q-q1 to get q2.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top