Verifying Solutions to Newton's Equation for a Harmonic Oscillator

  • Thread starter Thread starter terp.asessed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AI Thread Summary
To verify that x(t) = Asin(wt) + Bcos(wt) is a solution to Newton's equation for a harmonic oscillator, substitute x(t) into the equation m\ddot{x} + kx = 0, focusing on the linearity of the terms. For the second part, x(t) = Csin(wt + Φ) can be transformed into the first form using the sine addition formula, yielding coefficients c1 and c2 that relate to C and Φ. The discussion emphasizes that once the first verification is properly completed, the second follows naturally. It is suggested to ensure the relevant equation is clearly stated for clarity. Completing these steps will confirm the solutions effectively.
terp.asessed
Messages
126
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I am trying to solve the textbook questions, but the steps are not shown--any suggestions would be appreciated!:

1) Verify that x(t) = Asin (wt) + B cos(wt), where w = (k/m)1/2 is a solution to Newton's equation for a harmonic oscillator.

2) Verify that x(t) = Csin(wt + Φ) is a solution to Newton's equation for a harmonic oscillator.

Homework Equations


Given above...

The Attempt at a Solution


1) I only have a faint idea, but don't know where to progress...

2) I think I am going in a right direction, but don't know if it is of "ENOUGH" verification:

sin(wt +Φ) = sin(wt)cosΦ + cos(wt)sinΦ, which I put into the x(t) function:
x(t) = Csin(wt)cosΦ + Ccos(wt)sinΦ
= c1sin(wt) + c2cos(wt)

∴ c1= CcosΦ
c2= CsinΦ

...do I need further proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) The idea is that you fill in x(t) in "Newton's equation for a harmonic oscillator" . The equation is probably linear in x, so you can do the terms one by one and you can forget the constants A and B

Same goes for 2). What you do in your attempt for 2) is convert a solution of type 2) into one of type 1. So once you've done 1) properly, you are also done with 2).

You don't say, but I suppose in your context, Newton's equation for a harmonic oscillator is something like ##m\ddot x + k x = 0## ?
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
You don't say, but I suppose in your context, Newton's equation for a harmonic oscillator is something like ##m\ddot x + k x = 0## ?
... and that's the equation that should have been posted as "relevant equations".
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top