Vertical motion with retarding force

darkfall13
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I've used these forums quite a bit and found it very helpful thanks for all you kind souls helping us through the sciences, but today is my first post :P

I am deriving the velocity of a projectile fired vertically through a retarding force and I continue getting every step the same as the book until the last equation, it may be due to it being nearly 2 in the morning but I wanted to see others thoughts on it to help me learn the reasoning better. (And oh yeah this retarding force is only linear to the velocity)

so if we have:

-mg - km\dot{y} = m\ddot{y}

we can easily work to

-g - k\dot{y} = \ddot{y}

\frac{dv}{dt} = -g - kv

dv = dt(-g - kv)

\int\frac{dv}{g + kv} = -\int{dt}

\frac{1}{k} ln(g + kv) = -t + c

ln(g + kv) = -kt + c

g + kv = e^{-kt + c}

This is where the book and I agree to

but then it arrives to

v = \frac{dy}{dt} = -\frac{g}{k} + \frac{kv_0 + g}{k} e^{-kt}

Can someone explain to me how it arrives there? Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:)

Just notice, you can find c when t = 0, v = v0:

ln(g + kv) = -kt + c =>
ln(g + kv0) = -k.0 + c <=>
c = ln(g + kv0)

So,
g + kv = e^{-kt + c} <=>
g + kv = e^{-kt + ln(g + kv0)} <=>
g + kv = e^{-kt}.(g + kv0)
 
ah ok perfect thanks a bunch I kept going around in circles with it last night.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top