darkfall13
- 30
- 0
Hello everyone, I've used these forums quite a bit and found it very helpful thanks for all you kind souls helping us through the sciences, but today is my first post :P
I am deriving the velocity of a projectile fired vertically through a retarding force and I continue getting every step the same as the book until the last equation, it may be due to it being nearly 2 in the morning but I wanted to see others thoughts on it to help me learn the reasoning better. (And oh yeah this retarding force is only linear to the velocity)
so if we have:
-mg - km\dot{y} = m\ddot{y}
we can easily work to
-g - k\dot{y} = \ddot{y}
\frac{dv}{dt} = -g - kv
dv = dt(-g - kv)
\int\frac{dv}{g + kv} = -\int{dt}
\frac{1}{k} ln(g + kv) = -t + c
ln(g + kv) = -kt + c
g + kv = e^{-kt + c}
This is where the book and I agree to
but then it arrives to
v = \frac{dy}{dt} = -\frac{g}{k} + \frac{kv_0 + g}{k} e^{-kt}
Can someone explain to me how it arrives there? Thank you so much!
I am deriving the velocity of a projectile fired vertically through a retarding force and I continue getting every step the same as the book until the last equation, it may be due to it being nearly 2 in the morning but I wanted to see others thoughts on it to help me learn the reasoning better. (And oh yeah this retarding force is only linear to the velocity)
so if we have:
-mg - km\dot{y} = m\ddot{y}
we can easily work to
-g - k\dot{y} = \ddot{y}
\frac{dv}{dt} = -g - kv
dv = dt(-g - kv)
\int\frac{dv}{g + kv} = -\int{dt}
\frac{1}{k} ln(g + kv) = -t + c
ln(g + kv) = -kt + c
g + kv = e^{-kt + c}
This is where the book and I agree to
but then it arrives to
v = \frac{dy}{dt} = -\frac{g}{k} + \frac{kv_0 + g}{k} e^{-kt}
Can someone explain to me how it arrives there? Thank you so much!