Voltage and electric field in circuits

AI Thread Summary
In a closed circuit with one resistor, the voltage increases from V1 to V2 due to the EMF and then decreases back to V1, indicating that IR equals EMF. While the voltage between points b and c remains constant at V1, the existence of current suggests that an electric field (E) must also be present. The potential difference between b and c is zero, leading to the conclusion that the integral of E over that distance is zero, despite E not being zero. This is because while the points are at the same potential, the electric field can still exist within the wire. The discussion concludes with the understanding that the electric field can be non-zero even when the potential difference is zero.
proton
Messages
349
Reaction score
0
Let's say I have a closed circuit with 1 resistor. Let's say the EMF is between points c and a, the resistor between points a and b, and then between b and c there is nothing but the circuit wire. According to my textbook, the voltage at c is V1, increases by EMF to V2, where V2 = V1+EMF, and then V2 decreases by IR to return to V1 which implies that IR = EMF.

I understand all this. I understand that the voltage must return to V1 after completing the loop. But as you move along the wire where the voltage is a constant V1, deltaV must be 0 which implies that E must be 0 along the circuit path as deltaV is the work done by E. But since a current exists and is the same throughout the circuit, this implies that E must exist. So my question is how can deltaV be zero but the E not be 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is becuase potential difference between the points b and c in this case is the integral of the electric field E:

V_b - V_c = \int_b ^c E \cdot d\mathbf{l}

What happens when we evaluate an integral whose limits are the same?
 
umm... b and c aren't the same points. The whole wire between b and c are at the same potential but the electric field between them is not 0.
 
umm... b and c aren't the same points. The whole wire between b and c are at the same potential but the electric field between them is not 0.
I did not say that b and c were the same points. If the whole wire between b and c is at the same potential, therefore Vb - Vc = 0. This means that Vb = Vc, hence the limits of the integral are the same.
 
if the limits are the same, that implies that the integral is 0, but E can still be nonzero as the limits are the same, right? I think I got it. Thanks a lot!
 
Yup, you've got got it. And you're welcome.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top