Wavefunction Evolution Problem: Solving for \phi_1

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
Describe the evolution in time of \phi_1 = A \sin \omega t \cos k(x+ct).

Attempt at Solution
We have that

\partial^2 \phi_1 / \partial x^2 = -Ak^2 \sin \omega t \cos k(x+ct)
\partial \phi_1 / \partial t = A \sin \omega t (-kc \cdot \sin k(x+ct)) + A \omega \cos \omega t \cos k(x+ct)

Now, by Schroedinger's Equation,

-h^2/2m \cdot \partial^2\phi_1 / \partial x^2 = i \hbar \cdot \partial \phi_1 / \partial

So, substituting, we have

\hbar^2 / 2m \cdot Ak^2 \sin \omega t \cos k(x+ct) = ihA \sin \omega t \cdot kc \sin k(x+ct) - i\hbar A \omega \cos \omega t \cos k(x+ct)

\iff \hbar^2/2m \cdot k^2 \cdot \sin \omega t = i \hbar \sin \omega t \tan k(x+ct) - i \hbar \omega \cos \omega t

\iff \hbar^2/2m \cdot k^2 = i\hbar \tan k(x+ct) - i \hbar \omega \cot \omega t

\iff \hbar k^2 = i \cdot 2m (\tan \k(x+ct) - \omega \cot \omega t)

Is this it? What am I to do now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is \phi?

(Sidenote: Looking at the function, the first term is a time dependent term whereas the second term is basically a "traveling wave" (for want of a better term...its actually the wavefunction of a free particle).)

I don't know what \phi is, but if its the total wavefunction (we usually use \psi(x,t) for it..lol :-p) and if your algebra is correct, the last equation doesn't make sense: the left hand side is a constant, whereas the right hand side is a function of space and time...for it to hold, x+ct and \omega t both should be constants (by a simple argument).

You could play around a bit by writing the whole thing as a bunch of complex exponentials, using Euler's Theorem...

\phi(x,t) = A\left(\frac{e^{i\omega t}-e^{-i\omega t}}{2i}\right)\left(\frac{e^{i(kx+kct)}+e^{-i(kx+kct)}}{2}\right)

See if that helps...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top