Wavefunction obeying Schrodinger equation.

hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've attached my past paper question, which contains the relevant integral identity too.


The Attempt at a Solution



This question is relatively simple, yet I can't seem to complete it.

I used the schrodinger equation which is:

-(ħ²/2m)\nabla^2u + Vu = Eu

I then used the identity given in the question, to differentiate the wavefunction w.r.t to r twice. (In this part I had to differentiate by products since there was another factor of r).

Differentiating the wavefunction twice gave me:

(Z²/a²).r.u

When I put this into the schrodinger equation above, knowing V and E, I don't get the correct answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I forgot to say, that it's the first part of the question which I'm having trouble with.Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • QM question s.jpg
    QM question s.jpg
    41.7 KB · Views: 451
Can't tell you where you go wrong since you barely show any work, but I can tell you two things.

1) Your Schrodinger equation is incorrect.

2) You differentiated the wave function twice incorrectly.
 
I've fixed that now. I differentiated the wavefunction using the product rule:

using the identity given in the question, I had:

d²/dr²[ r. exp(-Zr/a)] Is this what I need to differentiate?
 
Out of interest, how would one go about solving the third part of this question?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top