What Are the Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors of This Spin Hamiltonian?

dreamspy
Messages
41
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I'm struggling with this question here from my QM class. I have read all my material on Spin (both Griffiths, and a chapter in an Icelandic book). I'we done some problems, but I really have no Idea where to start with this one. It goes something like this:

Two particles have spin 1/2 and are stationary, but their spins interact with this Hamilton operator:

\hat H = \gamma \hat S_3^{(1)} + \gamma \hat S_3^{(2)}

where \bf{S}^{(j)} is the spin operator for particle j, and j=1,2.

As a basis in the state space (hope that's the right word) you can f.x. take u_s^{(1)}u_r^{(2)} wherer,s,=\pm\frac{1}{2}, and \hat S_3^{1}u_s^{1}=shu_s^{j} and \hat S_3^{2}u_r^{2}=rhu_r^{j}

Questions:
(i) Find the eigenvalues and eigenvektors of the Hamilton operator.

(ii) How would the result be if we used this Hamilton operator instead:

\hat H = \gamma \hat S_3^{(1)} + \gamma \hat S_3^{(2)} + \lambda \hat{\underline S}^{(1)}\cdot \lambda \hat{\underline S}^{(2)}

The Attempt at a Solution



Now here is a quick solution I got from my teacher:

(i)
Triplet:


u_{\frac{1}{2}}u_{\frac{1}{2}}
(u_{\frac{1}{2}}u_{-\frac{1}{2}}+u_{-\frac{1}{2}}u_{\frac{1}{2}})\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}
u_{-\frac{1}{2}}u_{-\frac{1}{2}}

\underlince{\hat S}^2 = s(s+1)

The Eigenvalues:

(\gamma S_3^{(1)}-\gamma S_3^{(2)})u_{\frac{1}{2}}u_{\frac{1}{2}} = \gamma \hbar(s+r)u_{\frac{1}{2}}u_{\frac{1}{2}}
(the others should follow the same procedure)

(ii)
Two spin operators:

\underline{\hat S}^{(1)}, \underline{\hat S}^{(2)}

\underline{\hat S}^{(1)}\cdot \underline{\hat S}^{(2)} = \frac{1}{2}(\underline{\hat S}^{2}-(\underline{\hat S}^{(1)})^2-(\underline{\hat S}^{(1)})^2)

\underline{\hat S} = \underline{\hat S}^{(1)} + \underline{\hat S}^{(2)}<br />

\underline{\hat S}} has eigenvalue s(s+1) \hbar ^2, s=0,1


Now I almost have no clue on what's going on here.

Now I suppose the part in the Triplet section, is all possible linear combinations of the u vektors. And the eigenvalue can be read from the right side of the formula below. But could anyone care to comment on this? I'm standing on very shaky ground here :) This is the solution my teacher gave us, nobody has a clue what's going on, and were taking the exam tomorrow :)


Thanks in advance for any comments!
Frímann
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My basic quesion is probably, how do I choose the part in the Triplet section, are those the eigenfunctions? If not then how would I find them?
 
Well if I am not mistaken for two fermions the eigenstate should be anti symmetrical, i.e singlet and not triplet which is symmetric.

But I myself in a shaky ground... :-)
 
\underline{\hat S}^{(1)}\cdot \underline{\hat S}^{(2)} = \frac{1}{2}(\underline{\hat S}^{2}-(\underline{\hat S}^{(1)})^2-(\underline{\hat S}^{(1)})^2) = (1/2)[s(s+1) - (3/2)]<br />

remember

S_{1}^{2} = S_{2}^{2} = (1/2)[(1/2) + 1]
 
But what if we have u_{\frac{1}{2}}^1u_{-\frac{1}{2}}^2

How do we calculate \underline{\hat S}^2u_{\frac{1}{2}}^1u_{-\frac{1}{2}}^2 ?
 
[QUOTE said:
dreamspy;2493358]But what if we have u_{\frac{1}{2}}^1u_{-\frac{1}{2}}^2

How do we calculate \underline{\hat S}^2u_{\frac{1}{2}}^1u_{-\frac{1}{2}}^2 ?
[/QUOTE]

That is a singlet state which has s = 0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top