What Distance Negates the Dipole's Influence in Stokes Flow Around a Sphere?

funcosed
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The flow due to translation of a sphere in a Newtonian fluid at rest is given by the following streamfunction,

ψ(r,Θ) = (1/4)Ua2(3r/a - a/r)sin2Θ

which consists of a stokeslet and a potential dipole. If the contribution of the dipole is less than 1% it can be considered negligible. At what distance is it negligible?

Homework Equations



The origin is at the centre of the sphere and the axis Θ=0 is parallel to velocity vector U
U = |U| is the magnitude of the velocity
a is the radius of the sphere

The Attempt at a Solution


No idea where to start with this one, any tips greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So have got started at least, decomposing ψ into

ψs = Crsin2Θ the stokeslet

ψd = (D/r)3sin2Θ the dipole

C = (3/4)*Ua D = (-3/4)*Ua

then using the stokes streamfunction

ur = 2(C/r + D/r3)cosΘ
and
uΘ = (-C/r - D/r3)sin2Θ
Not sure if these are right?

then, u = (2C/r)cosΘ - (C/r)sinΘ

and large r behavior is like 1/r.

but this still doesn't really answer the question?
 
Last edited:
Can I simplt compare the C/r and D/r3 terms,
i.e. dipole is important for D/r3 > 0.01(C/r) ?
 
Was way off here its simply compare (a3U/4r)sin2Θ and 0.01(3raU/4)sin2Θ to get

r > a2/0.03
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top