What forces causes the top book to accelerate horizontally?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces acting on a top book resting on a bottom book when a horizontal force is applied to the bottom book. The top book's inertia causes it to resist acceleration, leading to a tendency to move backward relative to the bottom book. Static friction acts to prevent this backward motion, allowing both books to accelerate together without slipping. There is no external force acting on the top book that causes it to move backward; the motion is relative to the bottom book. Understanding these concepts often requires careful study of physics texts, as explanations can vary in clarity and detail.
Balsam
Messages
226
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


A small textbook is resting on a larger textbook on a horizontal desktop. You apply a horizontal force to the bottom book and both books accelerate together. The top book does not slip on the lower book. What forces causes the top book to accelerate horizontally?

Homework Equations


--

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer in the solutions manual says that the top book's inertia makes it want to move backwards. There is a force of static friction acting to prevent this attempted motion. It acts opposite the direction of attempted motion, forwards. So, the top book accelerates with the bottom book and doesn't slip.

But, I'm confused because, doesn't there need to be an applied force on an object for there to be attempted motion at all? There's no applied force acting on the top book that would explain it's attempted backwards motion. Do you always need an applied force to state that an object is attempting motion? Is there a fictitious force involved? This is a stupid question, but I'm just confused
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any backwards motion of the top book is only relative to the bottom book. Inertia gives it a tendency to remain still in the frame of reference of the room that it is in.
 
Last edited:
Charles Link said:
Any backwards motion of the top book is only relative to the bottom book. Inertia gives it a tendency to remain still in the frame of reference of the room that it is in. With physics concepts, you are likely to find some authors have more precise and more accurate explanations than others.
So there's no external force acting on the book causing it to move backwards relative to the bottom book?
 
Balsam said:
So there's no external force acting on the book causing it to move backwards relative to the bottom book?
That is correct. In learning physics, I think most of the textbooks are first-rate, but it is important to make sure that your textbook has good explanations with sufficient attention to detail. I think you will find some books to be better than others.
 
Charles Link said:
That is correct. In learning physics, I think most of the textbooks are first-rate, but it is important to make sure that your textbook has good explanations with sufficient attention to detail. I think you will find some books to be better than others.
I just use the textbook that the class uses
 
Balsam said:
I just use the textbook that the class uses
Most of the time, that is sufficient.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top