What is the acceleration of the connected blocks on a rough table with friction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of three connected blocks on a rough table with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.420. The initial calculation yielded an acceleration of 2.74 m/s², but after reviewing the equations and considering the contributions of each block, a mistake was identified regarding the friction force calculation. The correct approach involved ensuring that the gravitational force was properly accounted for, leading to a revised acceleration of 2.212 m/s². The participant confirmed that their teacher reviewed the work and suggested the initial discrepancy might be due to an error in the online homework system. Ultimately, the correct acceleration was established through careful reevaluation of the forces involved.
hm8
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three blocks are connected on the table as shown below. The table is rough and has a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.420. The objects have masses of 4.00 kg, 1.00 kg and 2.00 kg, as shown, and the pulleys are frictionless.

p5-50.gif

Determine the acceleration of each object and their directions.

Homework Equations


F=ma
Ffriction=mu*normal force

The Attempt at a Solution


I made positive in the direction i think everything is moving...counterclockwise.

Fsystem = msystem*a
m1g-Ffriction-m2g = (m1+m2+m3)a
m_1g-(mu*m2g)-m2g = (m1+m2+m3)a

a = (m1g-(mu*m2g)-m2g)/(m1+m2+m3)

I plugged everything in and got 2.74 m/s^2.

I think it's okay that I ignored tension and made everything one system...although maybe I'm wrong about that.

It also could be that I got the answer right, and my teacher entered the wrong answer for our online homework thing so it's telling me I got it wrong...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello hm8,

Welcome to Physics Forums!
hm8 said:
I made positive in the direction i think everything is moving...counterclockwise.

Fsystem = msystem*a
m1g-Ffriction-m2g = (m1+m2+m3)a
m_1g-(mu*m2g)-m2g = (m1+m2+m3)a

a = (m1g-(mu*m2g)-m2g)/(m1+m2+m3)
Check the above subscripts. Besides the indirect frictional part, the force of gravity on the middle block isn't contributing to the acceleration of the system. But what about block 3?
 
collinsmark said:
Hello hm8,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Check the above subscripts. Besides the indirect frictional part, the force of gravity on the middle block isn't contributing to the acceleration of the system. But what about block 3?
That was a typo, sorry...using the 2kg block (block 3) gives me the answer 2.74 m/s^2.

My teacher also looked at my work today and said it looked okay, so I think it may just be a problem with how he programmed the answer into the online homework. Unless you see anything else wrong with it?
 
hm8 said:
That was a typo, sorry...using the 2kg block (block 3) gives me the answer 2.74 m/s^2.
Okay then, your
...a = (m1g - μm2g - m3g)/(m1+m2+m3)
equation looks correct to me.

So the equation seems right to me, but something else does not (according to my calculations). See below.
My teacher also looked at my work today and said it looked okay, so I think it may just be a problem with how he programmed the answer into the online homework. Unless you see anything else wrong with it?
Try plugging the numbers back into your equation. I get something different than 2.74 m/s2.
 
Last edited:
Ahh...for some reason I was forgetting to multiply by g for the friction of block to...I was just doing μ*m

The new answer (2.212 m/s^2) works! Thanks!
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Similar threads

Accelerating pulleys (3 pulleys and 3 masses)
Replies
5
Views
2K
How Do Pulleys Enhance Efficiency in Two Block Problems?
Replies
13
Views
2K
Angular Acceleration and Linear Acceleration of a Pulley
Replies
4
Views
2K
Two blocks, a fixed pulley and friction
Replies
4
Views
3K
Block-pulley system and rotational dynamics
Replies
5
Views
5K
Find the acceleration of the system (2 blocks sliding on a table)
Replies
23
Views
2K
Friction, Mass and Acceleration: Analyzing Block Motion
Replies
6
Views
2K
Olympiad dynamics problem with 3 masses and a pulley
Replies
17
Views
2K
Calculating tensions and acceleration
Replies
10
Views
2K
What if check: Am I calculating tension wrong?
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top