What is the angular velocity at t = 2.4 sec based on given graph?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular displacement of a wheel at t = 2.4 seconds based on a provided graph of angular velocity over time. Participants clarify that the initial angular velocity is -9 rad/s and increases to 0 rad/s at 6 seconds, indicating a constant angular acceleration. The initial attempt to calculate angular displacement using incorrect acceleration values is corrected, emphasizing the need to use accurate data points from the graph. It is suggested to derive angular velocity at 2.4 seconds from the graph for better accuracy rather than relying solely on calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding linear functions in motion analysis.
SalsaOnMyTaco
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The graph shows the angular velocity of a rotating wheel as a function of time.
https://online-s.physics.uiuc.edu/cgi/courses/shell/common/showme.pl?cc/DuPage/Phys1201/summer/homework/Ch-10-Rotation/ang_vel_graph/omega_vs_t-2.jpg

What is the angular displacement of the wheel at t = 2.4 sec?

Homework Equations


ωf=ωi+αt

θ=θ0+ωit+1/2αt2


The Attempt at a Solution


I first try to find the acceleration it takes from initial angular velocity to move to t=2.4s
-6=-9+a(2.4)=1.25
α=1.25

so assuming θ0=0

θ=-9(2.4)+1/2(1.25)(2.4)2
θ=-18?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
any ideas? i also tried W=θ/t
 
what about bxh/2= 2.4*-6/2=-7.2 since the θ is the area is between above the line and the horitzonal x
 
SalsaOnMyTaco said:

Homework Statement


The graph shows the angular velocity of a rotating wheel as a function of time.
https://online-s.physics.uiuc.edu/cgi/courses/shell/common/showme.pl?cc/DuPage/Phys1201/summer/homework/Ch-10-Rotation/ang_vel_graph/omega_vs_t-2.jpg

What is the angular displacement of the wheel at t = 2.4 sec?

Homework Equations


ωf=ωi+αt

θ=θ0+ωit+1/2αt2


The Attempt at a Solution


I first try to find the acceleration it takes from initial angular velocity to move to t=2.4s
-6=-9+a(2.4)=1.25
α=1.25

so assuming θ0=0

θ=-9(2.4)+1/2(1.25)(2.4)2
θ=-18?

Your calculated angular acceleration is wrong. The angular velocity at time zero is -9 rad/s, and it is zero at time 6 seconds. So it increases by 9 rad/s over a time interval of 6 seconds.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chestermiller said:
Your calculated angular acceleration is wrong. The angular velocity at time zero is -9 rad/s, and it is zero at time 6 seconds. So it increases by 9 rad/s over a time interval of 6 seconds.
Thanks,
but shouldn't my final angular velocity be -6 since its asking for the displacemente at 2.4s?
 
SalsaOnMyTaco said:
Thanks,
but shouldn't my final angular velocity be -6 since its asking for the displacemente at 2.4s?

It is a constant acceleration. Which means Δv/Δt is constant. You can take any points as values.
The problem is that you are taking velocity at time of 2.4 secs.
You can only get approximate value of v at 2.4 sec from the graph.

Rather than taking value of velocity at 2.4sec, why not use other values that easy and accurate to calculate. It does not matter where you get your Δv and Δt since it is a linear function.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top