What is the Correct Equation for Deviation by a Thin Prism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deviation Prism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Snell's law in the context of deviation by a thin prism. The original confusion arose from the textbook's definition of the refractive index as "sin(refracted)/sin(incident)," which was deemed incorrect without context. It was clarified that the correct formulation of Snell's law is n1*sin(i1) = n2*sin(i2), applicable when light transitions from air to another medium. The misunderstanding stemmed from not recognizing that the textbook's definition only applies when light enters a medium from air (n = 1). The issue was resolved by understanding the specific conditions under which the refractive index is defined.
shr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This really is not a Homework question, but I guess it fits in here. So, according to snell's law the ratio of sine of angle of incidence to the sine of angle of refraction is a constant called refractive index. But, in our textbook while deriving an expression for "Deviation by a thin prism", Snell's law seems to be used incorrectly. They have written "n = sin (refracted)/sin (incident)", which I do not understand, until now. Probably I'm wrong because I'm just a learner. Do you guys have any idea?

Homework Equations


A scan of the derivation, from our textbook:
1zof3g2.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution


I googled, but did not find anything interesting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
General expression for Snell's law is
n1*sini1 = n2*sini2 where 1 suffices indicates the incident medium and suffices 2 indicates refracted medium.
Now apply the law to the face AC of the thin prism ABC.
 
rl.bhat said:
General expression for Snell's law is
n1*sini1 = n2*sini2 where 1 suffices indicates the incident medium and suffices 2 indicates refracted medium.
Now apply the law to the face AC of the thin prism ABC.

RL, I figured it out myself after asking the problem:)

The root of the problem arose from our textbook. They had, at first defined refractive index as "sin i/sin r" but did not mention that it only holds good in the case where a light ray falls from air(n = 1) into another medium. That's where I fell :)

Thanks for your reply.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top