What is the correct method to find the flux of a vector field through a surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bengaltiger14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Integral
AI Thread Summary
To find the flux of the vector field A=2x(x hat) + 3(y hat) + 2y(z hat) through the defined surface S, one must focus on the relevant components of the field. The y component is constant and should be integrated across the area of the x-z plane, while the x and z components do not contribute to the flux through the surface. The correct method involves calculating the integral of the y component over the specified area, leading to a flux value of 12. The initial approach mistakenly included contributions from all components instead of focusing solely on the relevant y component. Understanding the proper calculation method is crucial for obtaining the correct flux value.
bengaltiger14
Messages
135
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A vector field is given by: A=2x(x hat) + 3(y hat) + 2y(z hat). A surface S is defined by 0<=x<=2m, y=5m, 0<=z<=2m. Find the flux of A through S.


I plug the 5m into the z hat term to get 10(z hat) and then integrate.

Integrating the (x hat) term I get 4. The y hat term comes out because it is constant. Integrating the z hat term to get 20. Sum those up and I get 27.

The actual answer is 12. Can anybody tell me what is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are doing is simply computing the anitderivative of the vector field. That is not how to calculate a flux integral. There are several ways to compute flux integrals of which you should look up. If the surface is closed (e.g. a sphere) you can use the divergence theorem otherwise known as Gauss's law. Otherwise there are more standard ways to calculate the flux integral. Perhaps if you have a textbook you should read the section that explains flux integrals.
 
With flux you are interested in the component of the flux passing through the surface aren't you? So won't any components of the flux lying in the plane of the integral not contribute? So doesn't that suggest that you can ignore the contribution of the x and z components?
 
Still not getting correct answer. Lowly, you are saying the disregard the x hat and z hat component right?
 
bengaltiger14 said:
Still not getting correct answer. Lowly, you are saying the disregard the x hat and z hat component right?

Yes.

And now integrate the y component across the area of the x-z planar surface.

3*(2*2) = ...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top