What is the correct method to find the flux of a vector field through a surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bengaltiger14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Integral
AI Thread Summary
To find the flux of the vector field A=2x(x hat) + 3(y hat) + 2y(z hat) through the defined surface S, one must focus on the relevant components of the field. The y component is constant and should be integrated across the area of the x-z plane, while the x and z components do not contribute to the flux through the surface. The correct method involves calculating the integral of the y component over the specified area, leading to a flux value of 12. The initial approach mistakenly included contributions from all components instead of focusing solely on the relevant y component. Understanding the proper calculation method is crucial for obtaining the correct flux value.
bengaltiger14
Messages
135
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A vector field is given by: A=2x(x hat) + 3(y hat) + 2y(z hat). A surface S is defined by 0<=x<=2m, y=5m, 0<=z<=2m. Find the flux of A through S.


I plug the 5m into the z hat term to get 10(z hat) and then integrate.

Integrating the (x hat) term I get 4. The y hat term comes out because it is constant. Integrating the z hat term to get 20. Sum those up and I get 27.

The actual answer is 12. Can anybody tell me what is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are doing is simply computing the anitderivative of the vector field. That is not how to calculate a flux integral. There are several ways to compute flux integrals of which you should look up. If the surface is closed (e.g. a sphere) you can use the divergence theorem otherwise known as Gauss's law. Otherwise there are more standard ways to calculate the flux integral. Perhaps if you have a textbook you should read the section that explains flux integrals.
 
With flux you are interested in the component of the flux passing through the surface aren't you? So won't any components of the flux lying in the plane of the integral not contribute? So doesn't that suggest that you can ignore the contribution of the x and z components?
 
Still not getting correct answer. Lowly, you are saying the disregard the x hat and z hat component right?
 
bengaltiger14 said:
Still not getting correct answer. Lowly, you are saying the disregard the x hat and z hat component right?

Yes.

And now integrate the y component across the area of the x-z planar surface.

3*(2*2) = ...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top