What is the electric force of the molecule on the proton?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric force exerted by an ammonia molecule (NH3) on a proton located 2.50 nm away. The initial calculation yielded a force of 5.0 x 10^-13 N, which was questioned for its accuracy. Participants suggested using more significant digits and converting to atomic units for better clarity, as human-scale units can misrepresent values at the atomic level. The importance of appropriate unit selection for atomic-scale systems was emphasized to avoid confusion. Ultimately, the original poster acknowledged the feedback and corrected their understanding.
Bigworldjust
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An ammonia molecule (NH3) has a permanent electric dipole moment 5.0 x 10^-30cm. A proton is 2.50nm from the molecule in the plane that bisects the dipole.

What is the electric force of the molecule on the proton?


Homework Equations



F = QE = eE_yj = (-kpe)/(d^3)j

The Attempt at a Solution



((9*10^9 N*m^2/C^2)(5.0*10^-30 C*m)(1.6*10^-19 C))/(2.5*10^-9)^3

This gives me an answer of 5.0*10^-13 N, but that seems to be wrong. Anyone know where I went wrong here? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. You need to use more digits. My answer is about 10% off yours.
2. Why does this seem wrong? Is it because it's very small? Try converting this to atomic units i.e. eV/nm (electron charge*1V/nm) or calculate the resulting acceleration assuming no other forces (in m/s^2 or nm/ns^2).

The thing about atomic scale systems is that using human scale units is not appropriate. N,m,s,kg just don't make sense as good units, and it makes large quantities seem small and small quantities large.
 
frogjg2003 said:
1. You need to use more digits. My answer is about 10% off yours.
2. Why does this seem wrong? Is it because it's very small? Try converting this to atomic units i.e. eV/nm (electron charge*1V/nm) or calculate the resulting acceleration assuming no other forces (in m/s^2 or nm/ns^2).

The thing about atomic scale systems is that using human scale units is not appropriate. N,m,s,kg just don't make sense as good units, and it makes large quantities seem small and small quantities large.
Ah, okay I see what you mean. I finally got it, thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top