What Is the Equivalent Resistance Between Points A and B?

wr1015
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Find the equivalent resistance between points A and B for the group of resistors shown in Figure 21-29, where R1 = 93 and R2 = 40 .

http://server5.ihostphotos.com/show.php?id=fW6dc414515Bf2aS6b42f0eGf8aad2e7

ok i know that R_{1} and 35\Omega are in series and R_{2} is in parallel to the top 2 resistors but I am obviously making errors either in how i set up the problem or in my calculations. I have tried (1/R_{2}) + (1/2R) = 3/2R (as shown in my book) and then invert to show 2/3(R) and the answer I'm getting is wrong.. please help :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should first combine the two resistors in series, and then combine the result with the other resistor in parallel. What are the laws of combination for resistors in series? What about parallel?
 
Physics Monkey said:
You should first combine the two resistors in series, and then combine the result with the other resistor in parallel. What are the laws of combination for resistors in series? What about parallel?

for series: R_{eq} = R_{1}+R_{2}+R_{3}...
for parallel: 1/R_{eq}= 1/R_{1}+1/R_{2}+1/R_{3}...

so you're saying: 93\Omega+35\Omega+(1/40\Omega) OR (1/93 +35) + (1/40) ?
 
Last edited:
nevermind I'm an idiot.. i was forgetting to take the inverse of the answer :redface: :redface: :redface: :redface: :redface: :redface:
 
wr1015 said:
so you're saying: 93\Omega+35\Omega+(1/40\Omega) OR (1/93 +35) + (1/40) ?

Clearly the first statement can't be right since you're adding things that have different units. The second looks ok as long as you mean 1/(93+35). Like I said, first combine the two resistors in series. Take that result and combine it with the other resistor in parallel.
 
Physics Monkey said:
Clearly the first statement can't be right since you're adding things that have different units. The second looks ok as long as you mean 1/(93+35). Like I said, first combine the two resistors in series. Take that result and combine it with the other resistor in parallel.

thanks for the help
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top