What Is the Equivalent Resistance of This Circuit?

dewdrop714
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement

http://s685.photobucket.com/albums/vv212/dewdr0p714/?action=view&current=3circuitontakehometest1.jpg

The voltage is on the left (100V) and the jagged lines are the resistors in Ohms. I need to find the equivalent resistance of the circuit and after that the current flowing through the 4 ohm resistor.

2. Homework Equations

I = V/R


3. The Attempt at a Solution

I'm not sure if I calculated these correctly...

Equiv Resistance = 7 + (10/2) + 8 + (4/2) + 3 = 25 Ohms.

For the current flowing through the 8 ohm resistor, I = V/R = 100V/25ohms = 4 Amps
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi dewdrop714! Welcome to PF! :smile:
dewdrop714 said:
The voltage is on the left (100V) and the jagged lines are the resistors in Ohms. I need to find the equivalent resistance of the circuit and after that the current flowing through the 4 ohm resistor.

Equiv Resistance = 7 + (10/2) + 8 + (4/2) + 3 = 25 Ohms.

Looks good! :biggrin:
For the current flowing through the 8 ohm resistor, I = V/R = 100V/25ohms = 4 Amps

8 ohm? :confused:

Anyway, that's the current through the whole circuit … you need the current flowing through just the bit of wire containing the 4(?) ohm resistor. :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top