What is the explanation for the 4m mass going down in a double Atwood machine?

player1_1_1
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a double Atwood machine; on left side there is a heavy thing which weight 4m, on right side there is another circle (this circle which go around in atwood machine) and on left there is heavy thing which weight m, on right - mass which weight 3m. Now the 3m thing starts to go down, m thing goes up. Why the 4m mass goes down, while the mass on both sides are the same mass?
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/9270/testttti.jpg

Homework Equations


I got this result from Lagrange equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to research how the forces in lines and masses are existing, but I couldn't find any soluton for this.. why this 4m mass is going down? thanks for answer!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
player1_1_1 said:
.. why this 4m mass is going down?

Hi player1_1_1! :smile:

If the 4m didn't move, then the centre of mass would go down.

So the 4m must go down to keep the centre of mass where it should be. :wink:

(you'll probably find that 4a + b + 3c is a separable variable)
 
Thanks for answer!
does it have any explanation why centre of mass must be in same location? maybe some additional forces which force this 4m thing to go down?
 
Newton's first law (and zero net external force) ? :wink:

(Imagine you're hanging from the right-hand disc, instead of the masses, and you put your arms "above" your head … would you expect the left-hand mass to stay where it is?)
 
now i understand this, thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top