What is the gravitational potential energy of a satellite in a circular orbit?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the gravitational potential energy of a satellite in a circular orbit, the formula U = -GMm/r is used, where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Earth, m is the mass of the satellite, and r is the radius of the orbit. The radius given is 3 times the Earth's radius (3Re), and the satellite's mass is specified as 500 kg. Clarification is needed on the term "mass of the circular orbit," as it may cause confusion. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using accurate values for G and the mass of the Earth to calculate the potential energy. Understanding the parameters involved is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Ania
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i have to determine the potential energy of a satellite around a circular orbit and i have been given

the radius of the circular orbit is 3Re and mass of a satellite of 5.00*10^2 -- ONLY


Homework Equations



so can use the Gmm/r... and subsitute the mass of the circular orbit as 1.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite sure what you mean by mass of the circular orbit, but if you use U=\frac{-GMm}{r}, where G is the gravitational constant, M is mass of the earth, m is the mass of the sattelite, and r is the radius of the orbit, you should be able to work out the gravitational potential energy U. You might just need to google the mass of the Earth and gravitational constant. Hope this helps.
 
no...the satellite is orbiting around a unknown circular orbit with a radius of 3Re
 
Ania said:
no...the satellite is orbiting around a unknown circular orbit with a radius of 3Re

Hi Ania! Welcome to PF! :smile:

What do you think is unknown about it?

(Re means Earth radius, of course.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top