What is the Initial Mass Function problem and its solution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the Initial Mass Function (IMF) problem concerning star clusters. A participant presents their solution, calculating the number of stars with mass greater than 2 solar masses, arriving at a total of 56 stars. There is some debate over the method of integration, with one participant suggesting that integrating from 2 to infinity should yield the same result, while another insists on integrating from 2 to 10 and then adding the known five stars above 10 solar masses. Ultimately, both participants agree on the final answer of 56 stars, although one acknowledges a possible error in their calculations. The conversation highlights the complexities of star mass distribution and the importance of proper integration techniques in astrophysics.
grahammtb
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've got a solution to this problem but I don't know if it's correct. My lecturer hasn't given us any examples but I had a go and the answer seems fine. Here it is:

The IMF of a cluster of stars is: dN\proptom-2.5dm
There are 5 stars in the cluster with mass greater than 10 solar masses.
What is the number of stars with mass greater than 2 solar masses?

I put in 5 for dN, and solved the integral from 10 to infinity, to get the proportionality constant: 237.
Now using the constant, I solved the integral from 2 to 10 to find N in this range of masses. Then I added the 5 stars which are more massive than 10 solar masses.
Final answer: 56 stars.

Seems plausible to me, but I have no way right now of checking the answer.
Thanks a lot for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF :smile:

I agree with your math, though I am not familiar with mass distributions of stars and will take your word for it that part is valid.

FYI, you could also do the integral from 2 to ∞, and that will include the 5 stars with m>10.
 
thank you for your opinion. I've been working away at a few different problems and I seem to have them sorted out now :approve:
I found some examples on my physics department website which helped.

I did agree with you about solving the integral from 2 to \infty but I tried it and it doesn't give the right answer. I think this is since the question only says there are 5 stars above 10 solar masses, and so these could be very massive or only a little more than 10 solar masses. So I think the method is to integrate from 2 to 10 then simply add on the remaining 5 to give the correct answer :smile:

thanks again :smile:
 
That's weird, I definitely get 56 using 2 to ∞ for the integral.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=237*(2^(-1.5))%2F1.5&btnG=Search
 
Redbelly98 said:
That's weird, I definitely get 56 using 2 to ∞ for the integral.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=237*(2^(-1.5))%2F1.5&btnG=Search

Oh, I probably made a silly mistake when I did the integral. At least it confirms my answer of 56 :smile:
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Astronomy- Initial Mass Function problem
Replies
1
Views
1K
Finding the number of stars in the milky way
Replies
1
Views
1K
Initial Speed of Hanging Mass (HW Check)
Replies
7
Views
2K
What is the Initial Mass of Fuel Needed for a Rocket to Reach 0.1c?
Replies
9
Views
3K
Elementary Astronomy - Initial Mass Function
Replies
1
Views
4K
What Was the Initial Speed of the Proton in a Collision?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Calculating Solar Mass using peak Doppler shifts
Replies
7
Views
2K
Damped harmonic motion
Replies
3
Views
594
Initial Mass Function - how many stars are born
Replies
1
Views
2K
Finding the center of mass of a simple 2D shape
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top