What is the surface charge density of the plane?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on two physics problems involving electric fields and surface charge density. The first problem involves calculating the surface charge density of an infinite charged plane, given an electron's speed upon collision. The user initially attempted to find the electric field using an incorrect formula, leading to an incorrect surface charge density result. The second problem requires determining the positions in an electric field created by a point charge, with the user expressing uncertainty about the approach. Overall, the thread highlights the need for correct formulas and methods in solving electric field-related problems.
jm21
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have two problems that I need help working on. The first one is
An electron is released from rest 2.0 cm from an infinite charged plane. It accelerates toward the plane and collides with a speed of 1.0 x 10^7 m/s. What is the surface charge density of the plane?

The second problem is:
A 75.7 nC charge is located at position (x,y) = (1.0 cm, 2.0 cm). At what (x,y) position(s) is the electric field: a) -225,000i N/C b) (161,000i + 85,000j) N/C and c) (21,600i - 28,800j) N/C.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We ask that students show work.

Since the problem references charged planes, it would seem that one is referring to parallel plate capacitors.

Please try to write the formulas one would use for each problem.

Charges create an electric field, which is a vector field. Free charges accelerate in an electric field. If the electric field is constant, the force on a give charge is constant and the acceleration is therefore constant (assuming non-relativistic dynamics).
 
For the first problem I tried to first find E (the electric field) by using the formula E =Q/2εo(pi)(r^2). I got E to be 1.14 x 10^-11. Then I plugged E into the formula E = sigma/2εo where sigma is the surface density. This turned out to be 2.01 x 10^-22. However, that answer was not right.
I'm not even sure how to approach the second problem. I know you have to do the reverse of what you would do to find the electric field using the formula E=kq^2/r^2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top