What is wrong with this answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter seven0sav
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between mass and weight, emphasizing that mass is constant while weight varies with gravity. It highlights a calculation error where weight was incorrectly stated in kilograms instead of Newtons, which is necessary for accurate force representation. The correct formula for determining mass from weight is provided, demonstrating the need for proper units in calculations. Rounding errors and unit omissions are identified as key issues in the original answer. Accurate unit usage is essential for clarity and correctness in scientific discussions.
seven0sav
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Everything seems to make sense to me, but I know the answer is wrong..

"Actually, mass and weight are not the same thing. Mass is how much of something there is - which does not change throughout the universe (mass = density * volume). Weight is a force, which is constantly changing throughout the universe depending on the acceleration of gravity (weight = mass * acceleration of gravity).

You can work out a persons mass simple by dividing their weight by 9.806 (Earth's acceleration of gravity).

For example, if your weight = 80 kilograms, then your mass would be 8.15 kilograms. Because -- 80 kilograms / 9.806 = 8.15 kilograms"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are absolutely right about all the descriptions. Why do you say you are wrong??

The only errors I see is a possible rounding error, and a unit error.

you said "weight = 80 kilograms" this is nonsensical. You yourself said weight is a force (and it is) so you would need "weight = 80 Newtons" or some other unit of force.
Then when you divide by acceleration you would have "8.16 kilograms"
Always put correct units on all numbers in calculations, you forgot units on your acceleration as well.

It should look like:
80 Newtons / 9.8 meters per second squared = 8.16 kilograms.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top