Classical What was your first physics book and why did you choose it?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on individuals sharing their first encounters with physics and the textbooks that shaped their understanding. One participant recalls starting with "Conceptual Physics: The High School Physics Program" by Paul G. Hewitt in high school, followed by Giancoli's "Physics: Principles with Applications" during IB physics, and now using the 4th edition of Giancoli for a calculus-based course at UC Santa Cruz. They express dissatisfaction with the recommended "University Physics" textbook, noting it lacks clarity in handling complex concepts while over-explaining simpler ones. Another participant mentions a friend's experience with the same textbook, highlighting its depth in derivations but questioning its overall effectiveness. The conversation reflects a common theme of varying preferences and experiences with physics textbooks in educational settings.
RaulTheUCSCSlug
Gold Member
Messages
179
Reaction score
28
I was just curious on what was everyone's first Physics book, or what was their first encounter with Physics?

My first academic physics book that was not calculus based was my junior year of high school and was Conceptual Physics: The High School Physics Program by Paul G. Hewitt, and then later when I took IB physics used the IB Physics book, but used Giancoli's Physics: Principles with Applications 3rd edition, and now at University of California Santa Cruz I'm using Giancoli's 4th edition book for my first calculus based physics course.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They didn't give us a physics textbook in high school, at least not that I remember. The one my university recommends in University Physics, but I'm personally not a fan of that one.
 
fezster said:
They didn't give us a physics textbook in high school, at least not that I remember. The one my university recommends in University Physics, but I'm personally not a fan of that one.

Oh yes, one of my friends used that book (he was an international student from India) in high school, and I think it was pretty in depth with the derivations that it went through. Was there a particular reason why you were not a fan of the book?
 
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
Oh yes, one of my friends used that book (he was an international student from India) in high school, and I think it was pretty in depth with the derivations that it went through. Was there a particular reason why you were not a fan of the book?
Personally, I found that it went too in-depth with concepts that were easy to understand, and then went over the more difficult concepts pretty quickly.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top