When to convert units of temperature?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on when to convert temperature units in thermodynamics problems. For radiation calculations, absolute temperature in Kelvin is necessary, as radiation only ceases at absolute zero. In contrast, conduction calculations can use Celsius since temperature differences remain consistent across scales. The consensus suggests that using Kelvin simplifies calculations and avoids confusion, particularly in physics contexts. Overall, converting to Kelvin is recommended for clarity and accuracy in thermal radiation problems.
BlackJ
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


[/B]
(1)A sphere of radius 0.500 m, temperature 27.0 C, and emissivity
0.850 is located in an environment of temperature 77.0 C. At
what rate does the sphere (a) emit and (b) absorb thermal radiation?
(c) What is the sphere’s net rate of energy exchange?

(2)A cylindrical copper rod of length 1.2 m and cross-sectional
area 4.8 cm2 is insulated along its side.The ends are held at a temperature
difference of 100 degree C by having one end in a water–ice mixture
and the other in a mixture of boiling water and steam. At what rate
(a) is energy conducted by the rod and (b) does the ice melt?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So I'm studying the chapter about temperature, heat and the first law of thermodynamics. I start to feel confused about when the temperature should be converted. Sometimes it's Celsius sometimes it's in Kelvin. For example, could anyone explain why the first problem have to convert to Kelvin but the second one can be in Celsius?
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope someone like Chester comes along, who is an expert in thermodynamics, as I'm not.
But I think the answer here is straightforward.

In 1) radiation depends on the absolute temperature, so you convert to K.
( Only at absolute 0 is there no radiation. Just because something is at 0 oC, it is not incapable of radiating heat.)

In 2) conduction depends on temperature difference - which will be the same in K as it is in oC.
( You could even work in o F if you wanted, but you'd need to use a value for the conductivity expressed in those units.)
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and BlackJ
Same with what Merlin said. My rule is that you can pretty much exclusively use Kelvin in Physics because you can't go wrong with it; differences will be the same and relating things will be much easier, so it's nice to convert straight from the beginning. (Celsius + 273)
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...