Where Will a Falling Particle Leave a Sphere with No Friction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A particle placed at the top of a frictionless sphere will leave the surface at a specific height determined by the balance of forces acting on it. Initially, the particle experiences both gravitational and normal forces, but once it loses contact, only gravity acts on it. The discussion highlights the use of conservation of energy and free body diagrams to analyze the motion and determine the height at which the particle detaches from the sphere. The conclusion reached is that the particle leaves the sphere at a height of two-thirds the radius of the sphere. This problem illustrates the importance of understanding forces and energy conservation in dynamics.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


A friend of mine is stuck on a problem (that I saw about 2 years ago on the internet) so I thought about how to solve it but was totally unable.
Here it comes : Consider a particle on the top of a sphere of radius r. If there's no friction between the particle and the particle is falling, at what point will it leave out the sphere?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I was tempted to use the formula \sum \vec{F}=m\vec{a} until I realized that there was some complications. For example I got that the acceleration in the x-axis is worth g\sin \left( \theta(t) \right) and I have no clue about how to express \theta in function of the time. It's not like the particle is following a circular path. More precisely, there's no centripetal force... the only force that influences the movement is the weight of the particle (assume it has a mass m).
I've also thought about conservation of energy... but since I don't know at what height it will leave the sphere, I can't get the velocity which could have helped me maybe.
Can you help me a very bit? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi fluidistic,

fluidistic said:

Homework Statement


A friend of mine is stuck on a problem (that I saw about 2 years ago on the internet) so I thought about how to solve it but was totally unable.
Here it comes : Consider a particle on the top of a sphere of radius r. If there's no friction between the particle and the particle is falling, at what point will it leave out the sphere?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I was tempted to use the formula \sum \vec{F}=m\vec{a} until I realized that there was some complications. For example I got that the acceleration in the x-axis is worth g\sin \left( \theta(t) \right) and I have no clue about how to express \theta in function of the time. It's not like the particle is following a circular path.

It is following a circular path up until the time it leaves the surface. So you know a formula for the radial acceleration right up until that time.

More precisely, there's no centripetal force... the only force that influences the movement is the weight of the particle (assume it has a mass m).

That's not true while it is on the sphere. After it leaves the sphere, the only force is the force of gravity, but until then the sphere is putting a normal force on it.


I've also thought about conservation of energy... but since I don't know at what height it will leave the sphere, I can't get the velocity which could have helped me maybe.

Yes, use conservation of energy, which will give you a relationship between height and velocity. Also, use a force diagram right at the moment it loses contact, which will give you another relationship with velocity. You will need to do some trig, and think about what it means when something loses contact, but that should be enough to solve the problem.
 
Thanks a lot alphysicist!


More precisely, there's no centripetal force... the only force that influences the movement is the weight of the particle (assume it has a mass m).

That's not true while it is on the sphere. After it leaves the sphere, the only force is the force of gravity, but until then the sphere is putting a normal force on it.
You're right. I did the free body diagram at a point "x" on the sphere and put the weight and normal force. Maybe what I wanted to mean was that the body is not accelerating in the "y axis" which constantly changes.
It's almost 3am now, so I'll use what you told me tomorrow.
Good night!
 
Yeah, 3am or so is usually my limit for work, too. I'm a couple of time zones behind you, though, so with the help of a lot of caffeine I plan on still going a while. Let me know how the problem turns out.
 
Hi,
I didn't do that well. I realized that the normal force is not equal to mg\cos \theta(t) because if it was so, then the particle would lose contact when \theta (t)=\frac{\pi}{2} but this is not true.
Nevertheless I tried a few things... I thought that the centripetal force was worth mg\cos \theta (same magnitude as the normal force), thus a_c=g\cos \theta=\frac{v^2}{r} \Rightarrow v=\sqrt{rg\cos \theta}.
With a little trigonometry, h=r\cos \theta where h is the height at which the particle will leave the sphere. So it remained to find \theta... Then I tried to figure out a good free body diagram when the particle leaves the sphere, but I'm not sure. When it leaves the sphere, the normal force is worth 0N but there's still the weight. I can't find anything related to velocity in such a position.
WAIT! I just got it! Using the conservation of energy at this point I found out that \cos \theta is worth \frac{2}{3}! So h=\frac{2r}{3} which is the answer if I remember well!
Thanks so much alphysicist! I can't say I've all the credit, but at least I've done something.
 
That looks perfect, fluidistic!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top