Which Ramp Requires Less Work Taking Friction into Account?

  • Thread starter Thread starter teggenspiller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ramp Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing two ramps of different steepness for moving a heavy crate onto a truck bed, particularly considering the effects of friction. In a frictionless scenario, the work done to lift the crate is the same regardless of ramp steepness, as it depends solely on the height raised. However, when friction is considered, the less steep ramp requires more work due to increased distance and frictional force acting on the crate. Conversely, the steeper ramp, being shorter, reduces the impact of friction, resulting in less overall work needed to raise the crate. Ultimately, the steeper ramp is more efficient when factoring in friction.
teggenspiller
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two ramps, one steeper than the other, are available to move a heavy crate from the ground onto the bed of a truck. In the absence of friction, it takes more force to push the crate up the steeper ramp. Does this mean it also takes more work to raise the crate onto the bed of the truck along the steeper ramp? </b>Taking friction into account, which ramp requires less work for pushing the crate on the truck? </b>


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



IT all depends. The angle of the inclination actually has nothing to do with the amount of work needed to lift an object onto it, only the direction of the force that is causing the displacement has an effect.

However, assuming that more force is required to push an object up the steeper hill, and since force, displacement and the angle between the force and displacement vector are directly proportional, the more force would cause the entire work (J) to be higher. The angle, however, would not have an effect.

Taking friction into account, the less steep hill requires less work

and that's where I am stuck..
 
Physics news on Phys.org


actually ignoring friction, as long as you're raising both the same height (in this case, from the ground to the truck bed) the **work will be the same regardless of the path** (i.e. the steepness of the ramp). work is force times distance, but while the force required to lift something up a steeper (or maximally, a vertical) ramp/path, the distance is shorter so it balances out.

In a case where friction cannot be ignored, the path length matters... for example, in your problem, friction only affects the object while it is in contact with the ramp. more friction means more work, so you want to minimize the distance you have to spend on the ramp... since steep ramps are shorter than relatively long flat ramps, an object moving up a steep ramp will be less affected by friction, and thus need less work to raise a given height.
 


please note that the friction force also depends on the Normal reaction, which depends on cosine of the angle of inclination.

f = mg.cos(theta). So steeper the slope, lesser is the frictional force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top