Why Are My Particle Physics Calculations Incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a student's difficulty in obtaining correct answers for particle physics calculations, specifically when calculating the specific charge of a carbon ion. The student correctly identifies the formula but initially fails to use parentheses in their calculator, leading to an incorrect result. After receiving advice to use brackets, the student successfully calculates the correct answer. Additionally, there is a query about how to set the calculator to display results in scientific notation, with suggestions provided based on different calculator models. Proper use of parentheses and understanding calculator settings are emphasized as key to resolving calculation issues.
bobo343
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm currently studying physics at A-level, and for particle physics I'm fine about the theory of the equations, I remember what equations to use etc, but I can't seem to get the right answers from my calculator.

For example, when working out the specific charge of a carbon ion with Z = 6, A = 13 and a charge of 2+, the necessary equation would be Specific Charge = charge/mass.

Which is: 2 x 1.60 x 10^-19 / 6 x 1.67 x 10^-27 + 7 x 1.67 x 10^-27 + 4 x 9.11 x 10^-31

When shortened is: 2 x 1.60 x 10^-19 / 13 x 1.67 x 10^-27

Which finally should = 1.47 x10^7 C kg^-1

But when I enter 2 x 1.60 x 10^-19 / 13 x 1.67 x 10^-27 into my calculator, I get a vastly different answer of 4.110769231 x 10^-47

Is there something I'm doing wrong? We haven't done particle physics in a while and I might be missing a vital step.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you use brackets around the terms to ensure your calculator is doing exactly what you want it to.
(2x1.6x10^-19) / (13x1.67x10^-27)
and try again now.
 
Alright, with the brackets I get 14739751.27.

Is there any way I can set my calculator to give me the answer with the x10^n? (n just being whatever power)

Thanks for the help.
 
It depends on the calculator, but mine has a "scientific" setting, where the results in exponentials come up as e.g. 3.4567Exp8.
It's probably not a bad idea to practise putting things in the right scientific notation anyway though.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top