Calculating Force on a Ramp Using GPE: Clive's Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter elvinc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Gpe Ramp
AI Thread Summary
When lifting a block weighing 10N through a height of 1 meter, the work done is 10J, which equals the gravitational potential energy (GPE) gained. Pulling the same block up a frictionless ramp of 5 meters results in the same GPE of 10J. The force required to pull the block along the ramp is calculated as 10J divided by the distance of 5 meters, yielding a force of 2N. However, there is a concern about the validity of using vertical GPE to determine force in a sloped direction. To address this, calculating the force required to overcome gravity along the ramp using F = mg sinθ is suggested for a more accurate assessment.
elvinc
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm not quite getting this.

Say we lift a block of weight 10N through a vertical height of 1 metre. So the work done is 10 x 1 = 10J. This 10J equals the g.p.e. Of the block.

Now we pull the block up the same height of 1 metre but along a smooth, straight ramp (no friction between block and ramp surface) for a sloping distance 5 metres. The force is acting parallel to the surface of the ramp.

At the end of the pulling up the ramp the block still has a g.p.e. of 10J. So we can work out the force required to pull the block = g.p.e gained / horizontal distance moved = 10 / 5 = 2N

But I feel I am cutting fast and loose to use the g.p.e which is gained by vertical motion to calculate a force in a horizontal (or at least sloping) direction. It just doesn't feel valid to me. What am I missing? Sorry question is a bit vague but that reflects my view on this.

Thanks

Clive
 
Physics news on Phys.org
elvinc said:
But I feel I am cutting fast and loose to use the g.p.e which is gained by vertical motion to calculate a force in a horizontal (or at least sloping) direction. It just doesn't feel valid to me. What am I missing? Sorry question is a bit vague but that reflects my view on this.
Try calculating the force required parallel to the ramp to just overcome gravity: F = mg sinθ

Use that to figure out the work done and compare that to the increase in gravitational potential energy.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top