Work done by a harmonic oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the work done by a harmonic oscillator, highlighting the misconception that the force acting on the oscillator is constant. It begins with the formula for work, W = -ΔU, and critiques the assumption of constant force in the context of Hooke's law. The correct approach involves recognizing that the force varies with displacement, leading to the integral form W = ∫F(x)dx. The conversation emphasizes that while dW = Fdx is a valid expression, it applies only when the force is constant; otherwise, the force must remain within the differential. Ultimately, the clarification reinforces the importance of integrating variable forces to accurately calculate work.
Hunt_
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
In the case of an undamped oscillator, the work done by the system is written as ( assume initial position is 0 ) :

W = - \Delta U = - K \frac{x^2}{2}

But to verify this , we must assume that the force acting on the oscillator is constant , which is not true as F = f(x) according to hook's law.

To find an expression for the work done by the system I start with :

dW = Cos(F,x) \ d(Fx) = d(Fx) = -K d(x^2)

then it follows that

W = - K x^2

Ofcourse this eq must be wrong , but I wonder why. Why should the force of the spring be constant ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force of the spring isn't constant:

dW = Fdx = kx dx

Integrate that and you'll get the correct answer.
 
When you write dW=Fdx you already assume the force is constant . Otherwise , why would F be outside the differential ? We should write dW = d(Fx) keeping F inside the differential as it is not a constant. dW = Fdx is correct only when F = constant. True ?

Notice , when calculating the work done by an electron in a battery , we write dW = d(Fx) = d(qEx) = Vdq assuming the potential difference V = const while q is a variable. ( In this case F is not constant ). Had we written directly dW = Fdx , we would not obtain the correct expression. It is not necessary that dW = Fdx always holds true, it depends on the situation.

I hope you got my point.
 
Hunt_ said:
When you write dW=Fdx you already assume the force is constant . Otherwise , why would F be outside the differential ? We should write dW = d(Fx) keeping F inside the differential as it is not a constant. dW = Fdx is correct only when F = constant. True ?
No, not true. The differential element of work is dW = Fdx, not dW = d(Fx). (What does dF even mean? A small change in F?) Work is Force times distance; we need to add up (integrate) all the contributions of Force*dx over the variable x. Whether F is constant or not is a different story: if F is constant, then you can take it out of the integral. In this case F is a function of x, so dW = Fdx = kx dx:

W = \int F(x) dx \neq F(x) \int dx

W = \int F(x) dx = \int k x dx = 1/2 kx^2

Notice , when calculating the work done by an electron in a battery , we write dW = d(Fx) = d(qEx) = Vdq assuming the potential difference V = const while q is a variable. ( In this case F is not constant ). Had we written directly dW = Fdx , we would not obtain the correct expression. It is not necessary that dW = Fdx always holds true, it depends on the situation.
Again, incorrect. dW = F dx is always true--it's the basic definition of work. In the case where force is constant (and in the same direction as displacement):

W = \int F dx = F \int dx = Fx
 
Thanks , I think it makes much more sense now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top