Work due to varying acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calpalned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by gravity on a 2800-kg space vehicle falling from a height of 3300 km. Key points include the necessity of using the negative vector form of the universal law of gravity to account for direction, as gravity acts opposite to the displacement vector. The distance traveled is considered positive despite the vehicle moving from a larger to a smaller radius, as it represents a change in position. Clarifications were provided regarding the differential displacement vector, emphasizing that it is derived from the scalar product during integration. Overall, understanding the vector components and their implications is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A 2800-kg space vehicle, initially at rest, falls vertically from a height of 3300km above the Earth's surface. Determine how much work is done by the force of gravity in bringing the vehicle to the Earth's surface.

**I read my textbook's method and I got confused. Please take a look at my questions at the bottom of this post.

Homework Equations


See part three.

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is my textbook's method.
esfsf.jpg


I am confused:
1) Why do we have to use the negative vector form of the universal law of gravity?
2) The distance changes from 3300 km to 0 km (Earth's surface). All of the numbers between 0 and 3300 are positive, so is that why ##d \vec l ## is positive?
3) Where did ##d \vec l = dr \vec r ## come from?
4) During the integration ##\vec r ## vanishes. Why is that?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) We use the vector form because it includes the directions which are important in this question. The negative sign is there because the force of gravity acts in the opposite direction to ##\vec r##.

2) ##d\vec l## is positive because it is change in ##r##. As your textbook points out, you are moving from a large radius to a small radius, so the change will be positive.

3) Look more closely at the textbook. It says ##d\vec l=dr\hat r##, where ##\hat r## means unit vector in the direction of ##\vec r##. So ##d\vec l## is a vector of length ##dr## in the direction of ##\vec r##.

4)Look at the integration. We have ##\hat r \cdot (dr\hat r)##. Recall that the scalar product of two vectors will always produce a scalar, so there are no vectors in the final answer.

EDIT - Sorry I must have written answer (2) with my eyes closed! I think it's because you're looking at the work done by gravity, which is force over a distance, so this distance should be positive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Calpalned and AlephNumbers
So whenever direction is important, I have to use the negative vector form of the universal law of gravity?
 
The real question is "why is ##d \vec l = dr \vec r ## the differential displacement vector along the particle path?"

Notice that in the integration that they are doing, they are going from a larger radius to a smaller radius. So along the integration path, the lengths of the differential distances are (-dr). Note also that the direction of travel is in the negative r direction, as represented by ##- \vec r ##. So, the differential displacement vector along the particle path is ##d \vec l = (-dr)(-\vec r)=dr \vec r ##

Chet
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top