Difference between internal E and enthelpy

AI Thread Summary
Internal energy is distinct from kinetic and potential energy, as it encompasses the total kinetic energy of molecules in ideal gases, while real gases also include potential energy due to intermolecular forces. In ideal gases, potential energy is negligible, focusing solely on kinetic energy, which is temperature-dependent. The relationship between internal energy and enthalpy is defined by the equation ΔH = ΔU + PΔV, indicating that enthalpy accounts for changes in both internal energy and pressure-volume work. For ideal gases, changes in internal energy and enthalpy can be equivalent, but for real gases, they differ significantly due to the presence of intermolecular forces. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for analyzing energy changes in thermodynamic processes.
chiddler
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to understand two things:

1. How internal energy is distinct from kinetic and potential energy

2. The difference between internal energy and enthalpy.

Homework Equations


enthalpy ΔH = ΔU + PΔV
internal energy ΔU = Q + W = Q - PΔV

The Attempt at a Solution


I have searched old posts. I found this. And this.

My book asked a question: if an exothermic reaction occurs in a closed system, does internal energy change? The answer is no. So it seems that internal energy includes potential energy. Both pages that I linked say that E = KE + PE + U. This suggests that internal energy and potential energy are completely distinct, yet the book question suggests that they are the same! Also, how is internal energy different from enthalpy?

thank you very much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chiddler said:
1. How internal energy is distinct from kinetic and potential energy
For ideal gases, internal energy is the total kinetic energy of the molecules. For a real gas, it includes potential and kinetic energies.

In an ideal gas, potential energy (which is energy due to the separation of molecules relative to others) does not exist. So it is only kinetic energy that you have to take into account. Translational kinetic energy is a function of temperature. But diatomic and polyatomic molecules can have kinetic energy other than translational kinetic energy (vibrational, rotational). These other kinetic energies are a function of temperature as well.

For real gases, molecules exert forces on each other. This forces can be relatively strong (eg. water vapour) or weak (vanderwaals forces). It takes energy to overcome those forces to increase the separation of the molecules - ie. potential energy. So when energy is added and volume increases, some of the energy added goes into increasing potential energy, which means it does not go into increasing the kinetic energy of the molecules.
My book asked a question: if an exothermic reaction occurs in a closed system, does internal energy change? The answer is no. So it seems that internal energy includes potential energy. Both pages that I linked say that E = KE + PE + U. This suggests that internal energy and potential energy are completely distinct, yet the book question suggests that they are the same! Also, how is internal energy different from enthalpy?
In any process the change in internal energy is equal to the energy transfer that occurs. This energy transfer can result from Work (W) being done on or by the system or heat flow (Q) into or out of the system.

Since H = U + PV,

dH = dU + PdV + VdP

For an ideal gas PdV = - VdP so dH = dU. But for real gases, PdV ≠ VdP so enthalpy becomes useful.

AM
 
thanks very much for the excellent response.
 
chiddler said:
thanks very much for the excellent response.
The only problem is that the explanation for dH is not quite right!
Andrew Mason said:
For an ideal gas PdV = - VdP so dH = dU. But for real gases, PdV ≠ VdP so enthalpy becomes useful.
This is only true if T is constant, in which case dH = dU = 0.

I'll have a look at this again later.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
The only problem is that the explanation for dH is not quite right!
This is only true if T is constant, in which case dH = dU = 0.

I'll have a look at this again later.

AM

appreciate it. I'm not very comfortable in a calculus based approach as my physics was only algebra based. So could you please accommodate me in your response? (ie, more conceptual, please)

I didn't ask immediately because I didn't think this question gathered enough interest for follow up questions!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top