Certain isotope tell you that the decay rate decreases

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decay rate of a certain isotope, which decreases from 8337 decays/minute to 3174 decays/minute over 5 days. The user initially calculated the decay constant (lambda) and expressed confusion about it being negative, questioning the validity since half-life should be positive. It was clarified that if the initial activity (R0) is incorrectly assigned as the lesser value, it could lead to a negative lambda, indicating an increase rather than a decrease in activity. The importance of consistent unit conversion was emphasized to ensure accurate calculations. Ultimately, understanding the correct application of the decay equation is crucial for determining the half-life correctly.
xinlan
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Measurements of a certain isotope tell you that the decay rate decreases from 8337 decays/minute to 3174 decays/minute over a period of 5.00 days.

Homework Equations



R=Ro.e^-lamda/t
then T1/2 = ln(2)/lamda

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted all the units..
t = 5 days = 432000 seconds
R = 8337 decays/minute = 52.9 decays/s
Ro=3174 decays/minute = 138.95 decays/s
I did:
R=Ro.e^-lamda/t
52.9=138.95 . e^-lamda*432000
lamda = -1.86*10^-6

I am confused.. the lamda should not be a negative number right?

because half-life should be a positive number..
please help me..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if one take R0 to be the lesser activity and the later activity to be greater, then one will get a negative lamdba since the activity is increasing.

Usually R(t) < R0, i.e. R(t) is decreasing from R0.


If one takes the ln of the decay equation, one can make it linear.

Start with R0 = 8337 decays/minute, then R(t=5days) = 3174 decays/minute, but make sure units/time are on the same basis.
 
I should convert all the units right?

then if the lamda is negative, the half-life will be negative, and should I just plug in the minus sign as well on the computer?
 
I got it.. :)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top