Determine acceleration on slope using coefficient of static friction

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum acceleration of a sports car on a slope with a 21.2° incline and a static friction coefficient of 0.880. Participants clarify that the mass of the car cancels out in the calculations, allowing for a simplified approach. The correct formula for maximum acceleration is derived, incorporating the forces acting on the car, including gravity and static friction. One participant suggests that the error in calculating the final answer likely stems from using the wrong mode on the calculator, emphasizing the importance of ensuring it is set to degrees. The conversation highlights the significance of careful calculation in physics problems involving inclined planes and friction.
linzeluv
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
THE PROBLEM:
A sports car is accelerating up a hill that rises 21.2 ° above the horizontal. The coefficient of static friction between the wheels and the road is μs = 0.880. It is the static frictional force that propels the car forward. (a) What is the magnitude of the maximum acceleration that the car can have? (b) What is the magnitude of the maximum acceleration if the car is being driven down the hill?


I set up my fbd with the static frictional force acting in the -x direction, the normal force acting perpedicular to the inclined plane, and the weight acting in the -y direction. Without knowing the weight of the car or if it is at a constant velocity, I'm not sure how to go about setting up this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF linzeluv,

I think you'll find the in the end you don't need the mass of the car, it'll just cancel out in your calculations.

Secondly, you already know that it isn't traveling at a constant velocity because it's accelerating!
 
Setting up the equation

I thought this would be on the right track, but my answer for part A still isn't right:

Maximum Acceleration = Net Force in X-direction/ mass = -mg sin 21.2deg + maximum static frictional force/ mass

Maximum static frictional force = coefficient of static friction * Normal Force

Net Force in y-direction = ma = 0

Net Force in y-direction = Normal Force - mg cos 21.2deg = 0
Normal Force = mg cos 21.2deg

Final Equation

Maximum acceleration = -mg sin 21.2deg + .880 (mg cos 21.2deg)/ mass

Mass cancels out and answer is 11.6 m/s^2

Not sure where I'm going wrong.
 
linzeluv said:
I thought this would be on the right track, but my answer for part A still isn't right:

Maximum Acceleration = Net Force in X-direction/ mass = -mg sin 21.2deg + maximum static frictional force/ mass

Maximum static frictional force = coefficient of static friction * Normal Force

Net Force in y-direction = ma = 0

Net Force in y-direction = Normal Force - mg cos 21.2deg = 0
Normal Force = mg cos 21.2deg

Final Equation

Maximum acceleration = -mg sin 21.2deg + .880 (mg cos 21.2deg)/ mass

Mass cancels out and answer is 11.6 m/s^2

Not sure where I'm going wrong.
All your working and your final equation is correct, but your final answer is wrong. You must have punched the numbers into your calculator incorrectly.
 
make sure your calculator is in degrees mode not radians, I fell foul of that several times :-)
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...