Use the law of reflection and index of refraction to find apparent d

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the law of reflection and the index of refraction to determine the apparent depth of an object submerged in water. Participants clarify the calculations for object distance and image location, emphasizing the importance of applying refraction theory correctly. One contributor suggests imagining a cone of light from the object to analyze the angles involved in refraction. The correct approach involves using the formula for refraction and ensuring not to round off intermediate values prematurely. The conversation highlights the need for precision in calculations to arrive at accurate results.
rocapp
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See image

Homework Equations



n1sin(theta1) = n2sin(theta2)
1/s + 1/s' = 1/f

The Attempt at a Solution



My question is for the second part. I think I've figured out why I got it wrong, but I'm not sure.

So since the object distance (s) should be approximately 21 cm, then you apply the refraction theory to find

s'=s*n1/n2
s'=21*(1.33)
s'=~28 cm

Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-03-09 at 11.39.36 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-03-09 at 11.39.36 AM.png
    29.8 KB · Views: 538
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, not correct. How did you do the first part, since it's the same kind of problem? For the second part, where is the image of the fish in the mirror? That's your "object".

Once you have the correct depth of the "object", do this. Imagine a small cone of light coming from that object extending up towards the surface. If that cone has an angle θ, what will be the angle of the cone after it leaves the water? Use that and a bit of trig to figure out the apparent depth of the object. (Assume the angles involved are small.)
 
For the first part, I used

(Na/Sa) + (Nb/Sb) = (Nb - Na) / R

1.3/6 + 1/x = nb - na / R

.217 + 1/x = nb - na / infinity

1/x = .217

x = 4.61 cm
 
rocapp said:
For the first part, I used

(Na/Sa) + (Nb/Sb) = (Nb - Na) / R

1.3/6 + 1/x = nb - na / R

.217 + 1/x = nb - na / infinity

1/x = .217

x = 4.61 cm
That's an excellent way to solve the problem. But don't round off until the end and you'll get the correct answer.

The second part can be handled the same way, once you find the correct image location.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top