K&K Question 3.5 - Mass and Axle

  • Thread starter Radarithm
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Axle Mass
In summary: T_u+\sqrt{2}T_u-2mg=m\ell\omega^2From the previous equations:T_u-T_d=\sqrt{2}mgT_u+T_d=m\omega^2\ellSolving for T_d by adding the two equations, we get:2T_u=m(\sqrt{2}g+\omega^2\ell)T_u=\frac{m(\sqrt{2}g+\omega^2\ell)}{2}Substituting into the first equation, I get the correct answer. The problem is that I just can't get there with the equations in the same form you have them in. The closest I can come is what I showed above.
  • #1
Radarithm
Gold Member
158
2

Homework Statement



A mass m is connected to a vertical revolving axle by two strings of length l, each making an angle of 45 degrees with the axle, as shown. Both the axle and mass are revolving with constant angular velocity ω. Gravity is directed downward.

(a) Draw a clear force diagram for m
(b) Find the tension in the upper string, [itex]T_{up}[/itex] and the tension in the lower string, [itex]T_{low}[/itex].

Homework Equations



[itex]ma=mr\omega^2=ml\omega^2\sin{\varphi}[/itex]
Where phi is 45 degrees.

The Attempt at a Solution



Image: http://gyazo.com/8626cda317d6dca7dc1bbe751b643247
FBD: http://postimg.org/image/tez986p19/

The equations for the x and y directions, respectively:
[itex]T_u\sin{\varphi}-T_d\sin{\varphi}=ml\omega^2\sin{\varphi}[/itex]
[itex]T_u\cos{\varphi}-mg-T_d\cos{\varphi}=ml\omega^2\sin{\varphi}[/itex]

Solving for the tension in the upper cord, I get this:
[itex]T_u=-mg[/itex]

Assuming that the tangent of 45 is 1. Am I on the right track or am I making a mistake right now? If it has to do with reference frames, I wouldn't know what to do; I know that:
[itex]F_{apparent}=F_{true}+F_{fictitious}[/itex]
I don't know how to apply it though. Should I continue solving for the tension in the lower rope, or do I need to correct something?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Radarithm said:
[itex]T_u\sin{\varphi}-T_d\sin{\varphi}=ml\omega^2\sin{\varphi}[/itex]
Check the signs
[itex]T_u\cos{\varphi}-mg-T_d\cos{\varphi}=ml\omega^2\sin{\varphi}[/itex]
Check the term on the right hand side. Is this a cut-and-paste error?
 
  • #3
haruspex said:
Check the signs
Check the term on the right hand side. Is this a cut-and-paste error?

You're right. Fixed it and got the equation:
[tex]T_u=\frac{m\sin{\varphi}(\ell\omega^2+g)}{1+\sin{\varphi}}[/tex]

When I apply this to the hint: If [itex]\ell\omega^2=\sqrt{2}g[/itex] then [itex]T_u=\sqrt{2}mg[/itex].

All that's left is solving for the other tension. Thanks for the help.
It's funny how easy it is to make dumb mistakes :tongue:
 
  • #4
Radarithm said:
You're right. Fixed it and got the equation:
[tex]T_u=\frac{m\sin{\varphi}(\ell\omega^2+g)}{1+\sin{\varphi}}[/tex]

This is not the correct value of tension in the upper string.

Radarithm said:
When I apply this to the hint: If [itex]\ell\omega^2=\sqrt{2}g[/itex] then [itex]T_u=\sqrt{2}mg[/itex].

If you apply the hint i.e ω2l =√2g in the expression of Tu you have obtained,you get mg not √2mg
 
  • #5
Tanya Sharma said:
This is not the correct value of tension in the upper string.



If you apply the hint i.e ω2l =√2g in the expression of Tu you have obtained,you get mg not √2mg

In fact I get 2mg when using a calculator. I'm currently working on it. Am I off with the forces or the algebra?
 
  • #6
Did you fix the errors pointed out by haruspex in post#2 ?

If yes ,what are the two equations you get ?
 
  • #7
I did, and here's what I got:
[tex]T_u\sin{\varphi}+T_d\sin{\varphi}=m\ell\omega^2\sin{\varphi}[/tex]
[tex]T_u\cos{\varphi}-mg-T_u\cos{\varphi}=0[/tex]
 
  • #8
Radarithm said:
I did, and here's what I got:
[tex]T_u\sin{\varphi}+T_d\sin{\varphi}=m\ell\omega^2\sin{\varphi}[/tex]

Correct

Radarithm said:
[tex]T_u\cos{\varphi}-mg-T_u\cos{\varphi}=0[/tex]

You have denoted both the tensions by Tu .
 
  • #9
Tanya Sharma said:
Correct
You have denoted both the tensions by Tu .

Sorry, typing error.
So what am I doing wrong here? There is no centripetal acceleration in the y direction, is there? The mass is rotating in a horizontal plane.
 
  • #10
Radarithm said:
Sorry, typing error.

Okay.But what is the correct equation ?
 
  • #11
Tanya Sharma said:
No problem.But what is the correct equation ?

[tex]T_u\cos{\varphi}-mg-T_d\cos{\varphi}=0[/tex]
 
  • #12
Good .

So now you have got two equations .You just need to be more careful while doing algebra . Go slowly .

Replace sinø and cosø with 1/√2 . What is the value of Tu you get?
 
  • #13
Here it goes:
[tex]\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}-mg-\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=0[/tex]
[tex]T_d=T_u-mg[/tex]

Substituting [itex]T_d[/itex] into the next equation, we get:
[tex]\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{T_u-mg}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{m\ell\omega^2}{\sqrt{2}}[/tex]
Solving for [itex]T_u[/itex], I finally get the following:
[tex]T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+g)}{2}[/tex]

I still get the wrong answer which is off by 4.
I've tried another way but I get [itex]\sqrt{2}g[/itex] instead of [itex]\sqrt{2}mg[/itex]
and another substitution also didn't do the trick.
 
  • #14
Radarithm said:
Here it goes:
[tex]\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}-mg-\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=0[/tex]
[tex]T_d=T_u-mg[/tex]

Please recheck .
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #15
Tanya Sharma said:
Please recheck .

I got it:
[tex]T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+2g)}{(1+\sqrt{2})}[/tex]

This is what I get for not practicing. Thanks for the help!
 
  • #16
Radarithm said:
I got it:
[tex]T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+2g)}{(1+\sqrt{2})}[/tex]

This is incorrect.
 
  • #17
Tanya Sharma said:
This is incorrect.

How? I applied the hint using a calculator with the values m = 2 and g = 9.8
I got something around 27.718 which is equal to the root of two times 2 times 9.8.
 
  • #18
I just did this problem last week, and looking at my answer vs. yours, I'm having trouble understanding how you got ##1 + \sqrt{2}## in the denominator. I don't think it's right. Can you show your calculation leading up to the final answer?
 
  • #19
[tex]T_u-T_d=\sqrt{2}mg[/tex]

[tex]T_u+T_d=mω^2l[/tex]

Just add the two equations . What do you get ?
 
  • #20
jbunniii said:
I just did this problem last week, and looking at my answer vs. yours, I'm having trouble understanding how you got ##1 + \sqrt{2}## in the denominator. I don't think it's right. Can you show your calculation leading up to the final answer?

[tex]\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}-mg-\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=0[/tex]
[tex]T_d=T_u-\sqrt{2}mg[/tex]
[tex]\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{m\ell\omega^2}{\sqrt{2}}[/tex]
[tex]T_u+\sqrt{2}T_u-2mg=m\ell\omega^2[/tex]
[tex]T_u(1+\sqrt{2})=m(\ell\omega^2+2g)[/tex]
[tex]T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+2g)}{(1+\sqrt{2})}[/tex]
 
  • #21
Tanya Sharma said:
[tex]T_u-T_d=\sqrt{2}mg[/tex]

[tex]T_u+T_d=mω^2l[/tex]

Just add the two equations . What do you get ?

[tex]m(\sqrt{2}g+\omega^2\ell)=0[/tex]
 
  • #22
Radarithm said:
[tex]\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}-mg-\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=0[/tex]
[tex]T_d=T_u-\sqrt{2}mg[/tex]
[tex]\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{m\ell\omega^2}{\sqrt{2}}[/tex]
Agree so far, except on the last line, one of those ##T_d##'s should be ##T_u##.
[tex]T_u+\sqrt{2}T_u-2mg=m\ell\omega^2[/tex]
How did you get this from the above?
 
  • #23
Radarithm said:
[tex]\frac{T_u}{\sqrt{2}}-mg-\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=0[/tex]
[tex]T_d=T_u-\sqrt{2}mg[/tex]
[tex]\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{T_d}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{m\ell\omega^2}{\sqrt{2}}[/tex]
[tex]T_u+\sqrt{2}T_u-2mg=m\ell\omega^2[/tex]
[tex]T_u(1+\sqrt{2})=m(\ell\omega^2+2g)[/tex]
[tex]T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+2g)}{(1+\sqrt{2})}[/tex]


It should be [itex]T_u+T_u-\sqrt{2}mg=m\ell\omega^2[/itex]
 
  • #24
Radarithm said:
[tex]m(\sqrt{2}g+\omega^2\ell)=0[/tex]

No...that should be [tex]2T_u=m(\sqrt{2}g+\omega^2\ell)[/tex].

Now divide both sides of the equation by 2 .You get the value of Tu.
 
  • #25
jbunniii said:
Agree so far, except on the last line, one of those ##T_d##'s should be ##T_u##.

How did you get this from the above?

It was a typo.
And I recognized that dumb mistake (I multiplied the entire thing by the root of 2). It should have went like this:
[tex]2T_u-\sqrt{2}mg=m\ell\omega^2[/tex]
[tex]T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+g\sqrt{2})}{2}[/tex]
This should be correct.
 
  • #26
Radarithm said:
[tex]T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+g\sqrt{2})}{2}[/tex]
This should be correct.
I got the same answer, so either we're both right or both wrong. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #27
Radarithm said:
[tex]2T_u-\sqrt{2}mg=m\ell\omega^2[/tex]
[tex]T_u=\frac{m(\ell\omega^2+g\sqrt{2})}{2}[/tex]
This should be correct.

:thumbs:
 

1. What is the relationship between mass and axle in the K&K Question 3.5?

In this question, the relationship between mass and axle is that the mass of an object affects the moment of inertia of an axle, which in turn affects the object's rotational motion.

2. How does changing the mass on the axle affect its moment of inertia?

Increasing the mass on the axle will increase its moment of inertia, making it harder for the axle to rotate.

3. Can you explain the concept of moment of inertia in this question?

Moment of inertia is a measurement of an object's resistance to rotational motion. In this question, it refers to the axle's resistance to rotating when a mass is attached to it.

4. Why is it important to consider the moment of inertia in this question?

Considering the moment of inertia is important because it helps us understand how the mass on the axle affects the rotational motion of the object. It also helps us make predictions and calculations about the object's motion.

5. How does the mass on the axle affect the speed of rotation in this question?

The mass on the axle will affect the speed of rotation by changing the moment of inertia. A higher moment of inertia will result in a slower rotation, while a lower moment of inertia will result in a faster rotation.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
234
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
378
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
705
Back
Top