Hi!
I have to show that
[L_i,x_j]= i \hbar \varepsilon_{ijk} x_k
but my result is different, I'm definitely making a mistake :confused:
ok I wrote
L_i = \varepsilon_{ijk} x_j p_k
then
[L_i,x_l]= \varepsilon_{ijk} ( [x_j p_k , x_l] ) = \varepsilon_{ijk} ( {x_j [p_k , x_l] + [x_j...