3-D harmonic oscillator expectation value

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


The Hamiltonian for the 3-D harmonic oscillator in spherical polar coordinates is given in the question.The question then asks : using the trial wavefunction ##ψ=e^(-αr) ## show that


Homework Equations



##<ψ|H|ψ>/<ψ|ψ> = (\hbarα)^2/2m + 3mω^2/2α^2##

The following integral is also given## ∫ x^nexp(-ax) = n!/a^(n+1) ##for n≥0 with limits from 0 to ∞

The Attempt at a Solution



I applied the Hamiltonian to ψ. The \theta and \phi terms drop out. I then perform the integral of ∫ ψ^*Hψ but I have a term containing 1/r and the given integral doesn't apply for n<0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show your work.
 
dyn said:

Homework Statement


The Hamiltonian for the 3-D harmonic oscillator in spherical polar coordinates is given in the question.The question then asks : using the trial wavefunction ##ψ=e^(-αr) ## show that


Homework Equations



##<ψ|H|ψ>/<ψ|ψ> = (\hbarα)^2/2m + 3mω^2/2α^2##

The following integral is also given## ∫ x^nexp(-ax) = n!/a^(n+1) ##for n≥0 with limits from 0 to ∞

The Attempt at a Solution



I applied the Hamiltonian to ψ. The \theta and \phi terms drop out. I then perform the integral of ∫ ψ^*Hψ but I have a term containing 1/r and the given integral doesn't apply for n<0
What did you use for the measure of integration dV? It contains ## r^2 dr##, did you forget that ##r^2##?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top