Difference between Electric flux density,electric field strength .

AI Thread Summary
Electric flux density and electric field strength are closely related concepts in electromagnetism, with electric flux density representing the total electric field passing through a surface area. Electric flux is measured in volt-metres, while magnetic flux is measured in webers. Magnetic field strength (H) and magnetic flux density (B) are distinct, with H representing the intensity of the magnetic field and B being the flux per unit area. The relationship between them is defined by the equation H = B/μ, where μ is the permeability of the medium. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for clarity in electromagnetism discussions.
sachin123
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Difference between Electric flux density,electric field strength...

I want to know the difference between,electric flux density and electric field strength.Are they the same?
And also,there is a magnetic field(measured in Tesla),magnetic flux(in Weber),magnetic flux density(Weber per m2),magnetic field strength(measured in Tesla again?).
I am finding these very confusing.Can someone clear this out?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi sachin123! :smile:

from the pf library on flux …
In electromagnetism, flux always means total flow through a surface (a scalar), and is measured in webers (magnetic flux) or volt-metres (electric flux).

Flux is the amount of a vector field going through a surface: it is the integral (over the surface) of the normal component of the field​

flux density (btw, this is density per area, not per volume) is the same as the field …

flux = ∫ field "dot" area, so field = flux per area = flux density …

tesla = weber/metre2 :wink:

(and "strength" just means "amount" …

you can leave it out when writing, and ignore it when reading :wink:)​
 


I am clear with Electric field strength(=electric flux density) and electric flux.

1.)Does it mean that magnetic field strength=magnetic flux density?

and...
from what you said,
magnetic field strength = magnetic field.But,here is what my book says:
Magnetic field strength (H)=B/\mu
where B is magnetic flux density.
Now weren't they supposed to be the same?(magnetic flux density and Magnetic field strength)
 
Last edited:
sachin123 said:
But,here is what my book says:
Magnetic field strength (H)=B/\mu
where B is magnetic flux density.
Now weren't they supposed to be the same?(magnetic flux density and Magnetic field strength)

ah, i see …

your book is calling H (in amps per metre) the magnetic field strength …

i haven't come across that before …

i've seen magnetic field intensity for H, but not strength :redface:

oh, in that case forget what i said about ignoring the word "strength": clearly some books are using it to distinguish H from B (in webers per metre squared)

(but the best way to distinguish them is to call them the H-field and the B-field :wink:)
 


So,to conclude it,

magnetic flux is number of magnetic lines passing through surface area...
unit:weber

magnetic flux density is number of magnetic lines passing through unit surface area...
unit:weber per (m square)

magnetic field is same as magnetic flux density

magnetic field strength =magnetic field intensity is H =B/(mu)
unit:A per m

Is it correct?:smile:
 
Last edited:


'mu' i meant as \mu
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
764
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top