8.9 earthquake in Japan: tsunami warnings

[Math Is Hard]

It made me think of Bill and Ted. :)

 

[Ivan Seeking]

CNN is reporting that Japan's nuclear regulating agency has announced that a meltdown may be under way.

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

CNN is reporting that Japan's nuclear regulating agency has announced that a meltdown may be under way.

What kind of meltdown are we talking about? I chernobyl style disaster?

 

[jhae2.718]

From what I've read, anything that happens would be more on the scale of Three Mile Island than Chernobyl.

According to Stratfor: "Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) said March 12 that the explosion at the Fukushima Daiichi No. 1 nuclear plant could only have been caused by a meltdown of the reactor core, Japanese daily Nikkei reported."

 

[Ivan Seeking]

Blitzer is interviewing a Japanese Ambassador who is downplaying that statement. Apparently there is conflicting information. The announcment came from an official at the Nuclear Safety Agency.

 

[Ivan Seeking]

What kind of meltdown are we talking about? I chernobyl style disaster?

So far no other specifics have been offered.

One person described the efforts to save the core from melting down a "Hail Mary pass". I didn't catch the source of that statement.

 

[jhae2.718]

The Japanese government does seems to be releasing contradictory statements; I hope any confusion is limited to press releases and not rescue/recovery efforts.

 

[turbo]

CNN is reporting that Japan's nuclear regulating agency has announced that a meltdown may be under way.

I don't trust CNN's coverage given the lack of accurate information and the tendency to fear-monger for ratings. I was watching CNN this afternoon and had to turn it off after an hour or so of speculation, worst-case scenarios, etc. Their "experts" had no apparent contact with the plant operators, nor descriptions of current conditions at the plant, yet they were making claims that this was the third-worst nuclear accident in history.

"News" has degenerated into an exercise in rounding up "authoritative" figures with opinions that they want to express (not just in this case, but more obviously in the political sphere) and letting them pontificate. This is far too sensitive a matter to take that "wild swing" approach. It would be better to concentrate on the human suffering, lack of response, lack of food, water, etc, and the need for more portable medical facilities, IMO. Nuclear "catastrophe" will sell a lot more ads due to view-ratings, but it's irresponsible to make pronouncements based on what little solid information available to us.

 

[rootX]

I agree with jhae2.718, I heard it on the news. There wouldn't be anything like chernobyl style disaster.

Although Japan has a long and largely successful nuclear power programme, officials have been less than honest about some incidents in the past, meaning that official reassurances are unlikely to convince everyone this time round.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12720219

 

[Jimmy Snyder]

I haven't read all the posts in this thread so please be patient with me if this question has already been asked. Soon after the tsunami hit, I started hearing reports that the cooling system and all of its backups in one of the nuclear reactors had failed. In the following hours the situation grew worse. My question is, why can't they just pull all of the rods out of the reactor and separate them so that the nuclear fissioning dies out?

 

[Ivan Seeking]

I don't trust CNN's coverage given the lack of accurate information and the tendency to fear-monger for ratings. I was watching CNN this afternoon and had to turn it off after an hour or so of speculation, worst-case scenarios, etc. Their "experts" had no apparent contact with the plant operators, nor descriptions of current conditions at the plant, yet they were making claims that this was the third-worst nuclear accident in history.

"News" has degenerated into an exercise in rounding up "authoritative" figures with opinions that they want to express (not just in this case, but more obviously in the political sphere) and letting them pontificate. This is far too sensitive a matter to take that "wild swing" approach. It would be better to concentrate on the human suffering, lack of response, lack of food, water, etc, and the need for more portable medical facilities, IMO. Nuclear "catastrophe" will sell a lot more ads due to view-ratings, but it's irresponsible to make pronouncements based on what little solid information available to us.

I think there is far too much fear mongering towards CNN. They no sooner announced the "official release" from the Nuclear Agency than they had Japan's ambassador in front of the camera, who was downplaying the report. So let's stop the anti-cnn hype please. If you didn't watch the report then you have no business commenting.

 

[Borek]

I haven't read all the posts in this thread so please be patient with me if this question has already been asked. Soon after the tsunami hit, I started hearing reports that the cooling system and all of its backups in one of the nuclear reactors had failed. In the following hours the situation grew worse. My question is, why can't they just pull all of the rods out of the reactor and separate them so that the nuclear fissioning dies out?

From what I understand that's not the source of the problem. Reactor has been shut down, but there is enough short living isotopes in it to create excess heat that has to be dealt with. That's expected and not surprising, just their backup cooling systems failed.

 

[turbo]

I think there is far too much fear mongering towards CNN. They no sooner announced the "official release" from the Nuclear Agency than they had Japan's ambassador in front of the camera, who was downplaying the report. So let's stop the anti-cnn hype please. If you didn't watch the report then you have no business commenting.

The CNN "experts" apparently had no data on core temperatures, core cooling levels, flows, etc. I'm not saying that there is not a threat, just that reporting and grading threats with NO specifics is dangerous. The US needs to have nuclear power on-deck (IMO) in order to supply our energy needs, and we need to have relative risks and strengths of that industry presented fairly.

 

[Ivan Seeking]

The CNN "experts" apparently had no data on core temperatures, core cooling levels, flows, etc. I'm not saying that there is not a threat, just that reporting and grading threats with NO specifics is dangerous. The US needs to have nuclear power on-deck (IMO) in order to supply our energy needs, and we need to have relative risks and strengths of that industry presented fairly.

Just stay on topic please, for a change! It was an official report from Japan's Nuclear Regulatory Agency. This is not a thread about CNN.

 

[Jimmy Snyder]

From what I understand that's not the source of the problem. Reactor has been shut down, but there is enough short living isotopes in it to create excess heat that has to be dealt with. That's expected and not surprising, just their backup cooling systems failed.

But now they're talking about a partial meltdown. That would mean the fuel rods are still in there wouldn't it?

 

[OmCheeto]

I haven't read all the posts in this thread so please be patient with me if this question has already been asked. Soon after the tsunami hit, I started hearing reports that the cooling system and all of its backups in one of the nuclear reactors had failed. In the following hours the situation grew worse. My question is, why can't they just pull all of the rods out of the reactor and separate them so that the nuclear fissioning dies out?

Readers Digest version of how reactors work:

1. The rods being pulled out increase reactor power
2. The rods were all inserted during the earthquake, shutting down the reactor
3. The by-products of splitting Uranium are radioactive, ie, decay over time, releasing energy
4. These radionuclides are what are keeping the reactor hot.
5. It will take several days before these radionuclides have decayed to the point where forced cooling in not required to keep everything from melting.

My solution to the problem would have been to start up one of the other 3 reactors to provide power to the damaged ones. Unless of course, independence was not designed into the plant.

 

[lisab]

But now they're talking about a partial meltdown. That would mean the fuel rods are still in there wouldn't it?

That was exactly what I was wondering. I read that they had successfully achieved a SCRAM, but I've been reading about this from so many sources I can't remember exactly where I read that.

 

[OmCheeto]

But now they're talking about a partial meltdown. That would mean the fuel rods are still in there wouldn't it?

Eek!

Yes. The fuel rods are still in there. I read "rods" as control rods.

But the entire system is under tremendous pressure. To remove anything would depressurize the entire system. Doing this would ensure meltdown.

 

[Jimmy Snyder]

Readers Digest version of how reactors work:

1. The rods being pulled out increase reactor power
2. The rods were all inserted during the earthquake, shutting down the reactor
3. The by-products of splitting Uranium are radioactive, ie, decay over time, releasing energy
4. These radionuclides are what are keeping the reactor hot.
5. It will take several days before these radionuclides have decayed to the point where forced cooling in not required to keep everything from melting.

My solution to the problem would have been to start up one of the other 3 reactors to provide power to the damaged ones. Unless of course, independence was not designed into the plant.

Sorry, my knowledge of nuclear reactors and the vocabulary is not all that good. I meant pull the fuel out of the reactor so that they would stop reacting. Then separate them from each other or put them in lead envelopes so they can't react with each other.

 

[Lacy33]

Is this all coming from the Large Print Version of Readers Digest because I can't see well when I am screaming and crying?

 

[hypatia]

Ivan, my gut feeling is that the ambassador is not disclosing all he knows. He seemed to be trying to change the subject, while remaining calm.

 

[OmCheeto]

Sorry, my knowledge of nuclear reactors and the vocabulary is not all that good. I meant pull the fuel out of the reactor so that they would stop reacting. Then separate them from each other or put them in lead envelopes so they can't react with each other.

I don't know what the radiation levels are at the moment around the pressure vessel. But it is my guess that it would be suicide for anyone to attempt such a feat, in such a short time.

Astro has much more knowledge of industrial sized reactors. I'm more familiar with tiny ones that run boats. And we didn't do a re-fueling during the overhaul, so I don't know how many people would be involved.

As I said before, they just need to get power to the cooling pumps.

 

[Lacy33]

Ivan, my gut feeling is that the ambassador is not disclosing all he knows. He seemed to be trying to change the subject, while remaining calm.

Well then everyone get under your desk and put your hands over the back of your neck.

btw
don't eat the oatmeal.

 

[rootX]

(Meanwhile, my company is resuming its (Tokyo) business activities on Monday. There wasn't much damage. I don't know if this is true for all other companies.)

 

[Astronuc]

I haven't read all the posts in this thread so please be patient with me if this question has already been asked. Soon after the tsunami hit, I started hearing reports that the cooling system and all of its backups in one of the nuclear reactors had failed. In the following hours the situation grew worse. My question is, why can't they just pull all of the rods out of the reactor and separate them so that the nuclear fissioning dies out?

The nuclear fissioning stopped when the control rods were inserted, and the reactor went subcritical.

They would normally let the core cooldown and depressurize before opening the reactor vessel, but they lost that cooling when the lost offsite power and then the emergency diesel generators quit after one hour. It would normally be a day or so before they start preparing to unload the core. But since they lost cooling, there was no cooling down of the reactor, and it would be unsafe to try and unload the core.

At shudown, the fission products are still generating heat from beta and gamma decay, and there are also some alpha-decaying transuranics. The heat is about 5 to 7% of operating power, but this quickly decays as the short-lived isotopes decay rapidly over a few days.
This provides a reasonable overview -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decay_heat#Power_reactors_in_shutdown

I would expect TEPCO and the government to very cautious about what they reveal to the public.

In theory, they should be able to determine from certain radioisotopes whether or not the fuel in the core has been breached. Xe and Kr can be present in low levels from tramp uranium, or small breaches in the cladding. If there is Cs and Sr in the coolant, that could be indicative of fuel failures. If the detect Np-239, Ce-144 and other isotopes, this is a pretty good indicator of fuel failure.


The last I heard, the plant personnel were attempting to flood the containment with seawater in order to cool the reactor.

This shows the Mark I containment (from World Nuclear Net/GE) -
http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/183707_10150122455179029_53295319028_6446711_4177387_n.jpg

The will try to get water into the core which is inside the pressure vessel. I don't have any information on the integrity of the containment or the primary system, so I don't know if any of the recirculation piping has been ruptured. The steamlines go out of the upper portion of the reactor vessel, but steam line valves isolate the primary side from the turbines when the plant is shutdown.

 

[Jimmy Snyder]

They would normally let the core cooldown and depressurize before opening the reactor vessel, but they lost that cooling when the lost offsite power and then the emergency diesel generators quit after one hour. It would normally be a day or so before they start preparing to unload the core. But since they lost cooling, there was no cooling down of the reactor, and it would be unsafe to try and unload the core.

Thanks Astronuc, this explanation satisfies me.

 

[jhae2.718]

Thanks for all the explanations, Astro. My knowledge of nuclear engineering is lacking, to say the least.

 

[DevilsAvocado]

The last I heard, the plant personnel were attempting to flood the containment with seawater in order to cool the reactor.

Yup:

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11031301-e.html

All 6 units of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station have been shut down.

Unit 1(Shut down)
- Reactor has been shut down. However, the unit is under inspection due to
the explosive sound and white smoke that was confirmed after the big
quake occurred at 3:36PM.
- We have been injecting sea water and boric acid which absorbs neutron
into the reactor core.

 

[rhody]

Astro, thanks for clarifying things,

My next concern is how they will get power restored even partially with 40% of the plants not functioning, there are 6 total and 2 appear to be kaput. The others need to be inspected for damage, and repaired as soon as possible if it is safe to do so. Does anyone know what percentage of power these five reactors provide to the city and grid it was designed to serve ? Can power from other plants be rerouted to take up the slack once power is restored to what inhabitable structures remain ?

Finally, Astro, does the US possesses fuel rod technology that can in the absence of cooling water with the control rods inserted, or in the absence of control rods and cooling water to them entirely self arrest so to speak, shutting themselves down ? I was under the impression these was, please correct me if I am mistaken.

Thanks...

Rhody...

 

[nismaratwork]

The nuclear fissioning stopped when the control rods were inserted, and the reactor went subcritical.

They would normally let the core cooldown and depressurize before opening the reactor vessel, but they lost that cooling when the lost offsite power and then the emergency diesel generators quit after one hour. It would normally be a day or so before they start preparing to unload the core. But since they lost cooling, there was no cooling down of the reactor, and it would be unsafe to try and unload the core.

At shudown, the fission products are still generating heat from beta and gamma decay, and there are also some alpha-decaying transuranics. The heat is about 5 to 7% of operating power, but this quickly decays as the short-lived isotopes decay rapidly over a few days.
This provides a reasonable overview -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decay_heat#Power_reactors_in_shutdown

I would expect TEPCO and the government to very cautious about what they reveal to the public.

In theory, they should be able to determine from certain radioisotopes whether or not the fuel in the core has been breached. Xe and Kr can be present in low levels from tramp uranium, or small breaches in the cladding. If there is Cs and Sr in the coolant, that could be indicative of fuel failures. If the detect Np-239, Ce-144 and other isotopes, this is a pretty good indicator of fuel failure.


The last I heard, the plant personnel were attempting to flood the containment with seawater in order to cool the reactor.

This shows the Mark I containment (from World Nuclear Net/GE) -
http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/183707_10150122455179029_53295319028_6446711_4177387_n.jpg

The will try to get water into the core which is inside the pressure vessel. I don't have any information on the integrity of the containment or the primary system, so I don't know if any of the recirculation piping has been ruptured. The steamlines go out of the upper portion of the reactor vessel, but steam line valves isolate the primary side from the turbines when the plant is shutdown.

Do you have any information about the Daikishi facility?

 

[nismaratwork]

Astro, thanks for clarifying things,

My next concern is how they will get power restored even partially with 40% of the plants not functioning, there are 6 total and 2 appear to be kaput. The others need to be inspected for damage, and repaired as soon as possible if it is safe to do so. Does anyone know what percentage of power these five reactors provide to the city and grid it was designed to serve ? Can power from other plants be rerouted to take up the slack once power is restored to what inhabitable structures remain ?

Finally, Astro, does the US possesses fuel rod technology that can in the absence of cooling water with the control rods inserted, or in the absence of control rods and cooling water to them entirely self arrest so to speak, shutting themselves down ? I was under the impression these was, please correct me if I am mistaken.

Thanks...

Rhody...

We don't use it, if we have AFAIK, but that's why I was asking Astronuc about alternative designs that use different setups for the fuel, such as a Pebble Bed Reactor (just one example of many). I can't imagine we have much new tech in our systems given the lack of political will to do anything around the issue.

 

[Astronuc]

I'm frustrated by the lack of quality information.

I imagine that the concrete containment is intact, but I have no way to verify that.

I'm puzzled by comments about the water level, which is really the critical factor here. Ideally, the core is covered to keep the fuel cool. If the core gets uncovered, then the hot (overheated) fuel can be damaged to the point of cladding breach, which is when the fission products are released.

There could be some radioactive material in the coolant which comes from corrosion products activated in the core during operation. Fuel attracts crud, which is just corrosion products of iron and nickel from normal corrosion of stainless steel. At shutdown, some of the crud is found in the coolant, but is normally collected on special filters.

The information is sketchy and that simply contributes to the uncertainty.

It would help to know when the current cycle started.

 

[nismaratwork]

"They have detected radioactive cesium, and radioactive Iodine found outside the plant."

This seems to be the cause for this concern about a possible meltdown... and now the second unit temp is rising.

"9 people have radiation exposure on their clothing... not [threat to health]"

(CNN speaking of a release from Japanese Nuclear Safety [Admin?])

2 NRC experts are on their way to Japan, and while the name hasn't been said it sounds like we've sent at least one NEST team.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/12/japan.quake.nuclear.failure/index.html?hpt=T1

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
NEW: Some measurements may have been inaccurate, says chief cabinet secretary
"At this point, we still have not confirmed that there is an actual meltdown, but there is a possibility"
Engineers not able to see the core, but base their conclusion on isotopes in the air

 

[nismaratwork]

I'm frustrated by the lack of quality information.

I imagine that the concrete containment is intact, but I have no way to verify that.

I'm puzzled by comments about the water level, which is really the critical factor here. Ideally, the core is covered to keep the fuel cool. If the core gets uncovered, then the hot (overheated) fuel can be damaged to the point of cladding breach, which is when the fission products are released.

There could be some radioactive material in the coolant which comes from corrosion products activated in the core during operation. Fuel attracts crud, which is just corrosion products of iron and nickel from normal corrosion of stainless steel. At shutdown, some of the crud is found in the coolant, but is normally collected on special filters.

The information is sketchy and that simply contributes to the uncertainty.

It would help to know when the current cycle started.

I think the lack of information is a result of the comple interaction between the Japanese political arm of running maters, and the corporate arm (the latter is being more free with info). I'm simplifying here, but I'd trust their regulatory agency, not their ambassador. It doesn't sound as though there is confidence in any given outcome... so who wants to come out and say "meltdown", and who wants to be the one to say, "all is well"? Nobody... better for them to be vague in their view.

I find this worrying, at least, in a general sense...

 

[Astronuc]

Astro, thanks for clarifying things,

My next concern is how they will get power restored even partially with 40% of the plants not functioning, there are 6 total and 2 appear to be kaput. The others need to be inspected for damage, and repaired as soon as possible if it is safe to do so. Does anyone know what percentage of power these five reactors provide to the city and grid it was designed to serve ? Can power from other plants be rerouted to take up the slack once power is restored to what inhabitable structures remain ?

Finally, Astro, does the US possesses fuel rod technology that can in the absence of cooling water with the control rods inserted, or in the absence of control rods and cooling water to them entirely self arrest so to speak, shutting themselves down ? I was under the impression these was, please correct me if I am mistaken.

Thanks...

Rhody...

"TEPCO owns 17 nuclear reactors, 10 in Fukushima Prefecture and 7 in Niigata Kashiwazaki Kariwa, and the total capacity is 17,308 MW. Nuclear power is considered as a base load energy and it accounts for approximately 40% of TEPCO's total electricity output." Ref: http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/challenge/energy/nuclear/plants-e.html
Unfortunately, there seem to be problems with their pdfs or my version of Acrobat.

So TEPCO has other units using coal, oil and natural gas. They also have agreements with other utilities to provide power. I think one problem for TEPCO is the damage to the grid and substations. Units 4, 5 and 6 were shutdown at the time, so hopefully they could be started when needed.

The US does not reprocess spent fuel. Currently plants around the country place fuel in the spent fuel pool, which is away from the reactor and containment. Older fuel that has cooled for a decade or more can go into dry storage.

 

[nismaratwork]

"TEPCO owns 17 nuclear reactors, 10 in Fukushima Prefecture and 7 in Niigata Kashiwazaki Kariwa, and the total capacity is 17,308 MW. Nuclear power is considered as a base load energy and it accounts for approximately 40% of TEPCO's total electricity output." Ref: http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/challenge/energy/nuclear/plants-e.html
Unfortunately, there seem to be problems with their pdfs or my version of Acrobat.

So TEPCO has other units using coal, oil and natural gas. They also have agreements with other utilities to provide power. I think one problem for TEPCO is the damage to the grid and substations. Units 4, 5 and 6 were shutdown at the time, so hopefully they could be started when needed.

The US does not reprocess spent fuel. Currently plants around the country place fuel in the spent fuel pool, which is away from the reactor and containment. Older fuel that has cooled for a decade or more can go into dry storage.

I can only imagine that the most effected regions have had their infrastructure absolutely devestates... I wonder if any of these plants have a place to send their juice at all? Even if you restore the grid's transmission and transforming, you'd have so much local damage from fires and heaving ground... I'm not sure you'd do much.

 

[Dantele]

0147: The legal limit for radioactivity has been passed at the Fukushima plant, AFP says, quoting Japan's Kyodo news agency.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12307698

 

[aspid]

Possibly dumb question: why the boric acid, if the control rods are fully in and reactor is subcritical? If only as a precaution, it's a precaution against what risk ?

 

[caffenta]

Unfortunately, there seem to be problems with their pdfs or my version of Acrobat.

I can open them. I checked the embedded fonts and some of them are Japanese fonts, even though no Japanese characters are used (except for the author in the properties page). That's probably why you have problems. I attached the "in-depth" pdf, it's only one page.

 

[nismaratwork]

Possibly dumb question: why the boric acid, if the control rods are fully in and reactor is subcritical? If only as a precaution, it's a precaution against what risk ?

The boron in the boric acid is a strong neutron poison, meaning that it absorbs neutrons that would otherwise be absorbed by control rods, OR... in the worst case scenario, from keeping the fuel from doing the same and continuing fission.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_poison

edit:

Soluble poisons, also called chemical shim, produce a spatially uniform neutron absorption when dissolved in the water coolant. The most common soluble poison in commercial pressurized water reactors (PWR) is boric acid, which is often referred to as soluble boron, or simply solbor. The boric acid in the coolant decreases the thermal utilization factor, causing a decrease in reactivity. By varying the concentration of boric acid in the coolant, a process referred to as boration and dilution, the reactivity of the core can be easily varied. If the boron concentration is increased, the coolant/moderator absorbs more neutrons, adding negative reactivity. If the boron concentration is reduced (dilution), positive reactivity is added. The changing of boron concentration in a PWR is a slow process and is used primarily to compensate for fuel burnout or poison buildup. The variation in boron concentration allows control rod use to be minimized, which results in a flatter flux profile over the core than can be produced by rod insertion. The flatter flux profile occurs because there are no regions of depressed flux like those that would be produced in the vicinity of inserted control rods. This system is not in widespread use because the chemicals make the moderator temperature reactivity coefficient less negative.[8]

Soluble poisons are also used in emergency shutdown systems. During SCRAM the operators can inject solutions containing neutron poisons directly into the reactor coolant...

edit: Note, flooding a reactor with neutron poisons and especially sea water = the final death of this reactor. It seems unlikely to meltdown, I hope... but it will never run again.

 

[nismaratwork]

Astounding... CNN is all over this, however their information may vary...

MSNBC is playing (a re-run I think) of a prison show "Lockup"
Fox News is... wait for it... slamming Health Care a la Michelle 'Meesa one woman brain trust!' Bachman.

And we wonder why ideolgues who don't flip the channels or read are genuinely uninformed.

edit: Note: This is while a rescue is occurring live in Sendai, and new info is coming in about a possible radiological incident (or not as the case may be).

 

[Astronuc]

Possibly dumb question: why the boric acid, if the control rods are fully in and reactor is subcritical? If only as a precaution, it's a precaution against what risk ?

I suspect as a precaution. The control rods inserted, even with the strongest one left out, are designed to keep the reactor subcritical, i.e., shutdown.

If they are concerned about damage to the control blades because of high temperatures, then adding boric acid is additional insurance. If some control rods were breached, then they could lose their boron carbide due to reaction with water.

Some control rods are used during operation of the reactor, and over time, their neutron absorption capability is reduced. Boron under goes an n,alpha reaction, in which the boron (B-10) nuclear absorbs a neutron and fissions into an alpha particle and Li nucleus. That btw doesn't produce as much energy as the fission of a U-235 atom. The Li and boron can react with water. Adding boric acid simply ensures that the core is subcritical.

 

[caffenta]

Astounding... CNN is all over this, however their information may vary...

MSNBC is playing (a re-run I think) of a prison show "Lockup"
Fox News is... wait for it... slamming Health Care a la Michelle 'Meesa one woman brain trust!' Bachman.

And we wonder why ideolgues who don't flip the channels or read are genuinely uninformed.

edit: Note: This is while a rescue is occurring live in Sendai, and new info is coming in about a possible radiological incident (or not as the case may be).

To be frank, viewed from inside Japan (although I am not Japanese), I'd much rather all those sensationalism-seeking networks - CNN included - stay the **** out of it. They're like NASCAR spectators, whose main interest is to witness an accident. All they do is spread unsubstantiated bs. I guess the death count is not impressive enough. Good.

 

[nismaratwork]

To be frank, viewed from inside Japan (although I am not Japanese), I'd much rather all those sensationalism-seeking networks - CNN included - stay the **** out of it. They're like NASCAR spectators, whose main interest is to witness an accident. All they do is spread unsubstantiated bs. I guess the death count is not impressive enough. Good.

It is unfortunate, but the lack of quality reporting shouldn't be an excuse to not report at all.

 

[aspid]

Yeah, I understood that, was hoping for a softer version. I'm going on fifth grade physics here, but is there a risk of a power excursion, say if the fuel changes configuration due to a meltdown ? And the boron is there to ensure an as uniform/as much as possible neutron absorbition inside all the mess ? My attempts at logic with over-simplified hypotheses make me very worried about what's going on.

@astronuc: thanks for the more detailed explanation.

 

[nismaratwork]

Yeah, I understood that, was hoping for a softer version. I'm going on fifth grade physics here, but is there a risk of a power excursion, say if the fuel changes configuration due to a meltdown ? And the boron is there to ensure an as uniform/as much as possible neutron absorbition inside all the mess ? My attempts at logic with over-simplified hypotheses make me very worried about what's going on.

The fuel could overheat and meltdown, but there won't be a criticality event... i.e. a massive radiation release. When you're killing a reactor forever, you might as well be thorough... that's what I'm taking away from Astronuc's posts. When you SCRAM... don't go half-measures.

 

[Astronuc]

Yeah, I understood that, was hoping for a softer version. I'm going on fifth grade physics here, but is there a risk of a power excursion, say if the fuel changes configuration due to a meltdown ? And the boron is there to ensure an as uniform/as much as possible neutron absorbition inside all the mess ? My attempts at logic with over-simplified hypotheses make me very worried about what's going on.

If the fuel was damage to point where it would collapse, it would be in a less moderated configuration, so it would not become critical from subcritical. The control blades are likely still between the assemblies. The boron in the coolant just ensures that the core maintains subcriticality under any circumstance.

 

[Astronuc]

I plotted magnitude vs time since the mag 7.2 quake on 3/9/2011 2:45:20 AM.

While it would seem to have been prudent to shutdown the reactors during that period, one can see the magnitudes and frequency diminish, so there was perhaps a false sense of security. The 8.9 happened abruptly. The aftershocks include numerous quakes in the 5 and 6 mag range. They seem to be decreasing in magnitude.

The plot also includes three quakes that happened to the west or northwest of Tokyo.

There are 308 quakes represented, and it's possible that ones below mag 4 are filtered out, so there could be many more in the 2 to <4 range.

 

[caffenta]

It is unfortunate, but the lack of quality reporting shouldn't be an excuse to not report at all.

Use real news sources, not 24-hour "news" channels. Most of Japan's major papers and news outlets have English pages. They will have translations available quicker than US sources.

 

[nismaratwork]

Use real news sources, not 24-hour "news" channels. Most of Japan's major papers and news outlets have English pages. They will have translations available quicker than US sources.

In my experience, and with Japan it isn't a little experience, their media outlets are bought and paid for by political forces. I prefer to read them, watch CNN, PF, and other outlets at once, and then suspend judgement until more evidence arrives.